Skip to main content

Provision of mechanical ventilation to pregnant/postpartum women with H1N1 influenza: a case-control study

Introduction

During the influenza pandemic of 2009, clinicians delivered mechanical ventilation to pregnant women with little evidence to guide practice. The objective of this study was to compare the provision of mechanical ventilation to pregnant/postpartum women and a nonpregnant matched control group admitted to the ICU with H1N1 influenza.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted following ethics approval. A case was defined as a ventilated pregnant/postpartum woman reported to the Australian and New Zealand INFINITE H1N1 09 study from 1 June 2009 to 31 August 2009. Controls were ventilated nonpregnant women (15 to 49 years) reported to the INFINITE H1N1 09 study during the same time frame. Data were entered into SPSS and analysed using nonparametric statistics; two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

We studied 36 index cases and 38 controls. Index cases were more likely to have a single arterial blood gas (ABG) taken prior to intubation (P < 0.05). Similar reasons were given for the trigger to intubate (high respiratory rate, low PaO2, increased work of breathing) apart from a high PaCO2, which was a trigger in the control group only (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the pre-intubation and post intubation ABGs apart from a lower PaCO2 (P < 0.05) and lower HCO3 (P < 0.05) in cases, and cases presented with a lower haemoglobin (P < 0.05). There were six difficult intubations documented with no differences between groups. Initial ventilator settings including mode, tidal volume, minute volume and respiratory rate demonstrated no differences. Both groups showed increases in PaO2 and PaCO2, and a decrease in pH from the pre-intubation to post-intubation ABGs (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

There were physiological differences between the two groups with pregnant/postpartum women showing lower PaCO2 and HCO3. However, initial ventilator support was not significantly different for pregnant/postpartum women compared with controls.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WE Pollock.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollock, W., Bellomo, R., Webb, S. et al. Provision of mechanical ventilation to pregnant/postpartum women with H1N1 influenza: a case-control study. Crit Care 17, P117 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12055

Download citation

Keywords

  • Influenza
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • HCO3
  • Index Case
  • Influenza Pandemic