- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Internal jugular vein catheterization: a comparative study of apical and paracarotid approaches
Critical Care volume 16, Article number: P64 (2012)
Introduction
Central venous catheterization (CVC) is a frequently performed procedure in ICUs for both monitoring and definitive central venous access. Although the apical approach is the most preferred technique in our practice, a modified landmark guided technique that uses only the carotid artery pulsation as a landmark (paracarotid approach) to locate the puncture site for internal jugular venous (IJV) catheterization attained a high success rate with few complications. The aim of the study was to compare two approaches used for IJV cannulation: the apical approach and the paracarotid approach. The primary endpoint was the rate of success. The secondary endpoints were the related adverse events and the difficulty factors (number of attempts).
Methods
A prospective, randomized clinical trial in a tertiary-care university teaching hospital. After obtaining approval from the Hospital Ethics Committee, 50 adult patients admitted to our ICU with an absolute indication for CVC were randomized to undergo one of the two techniques. We compared the demographics, success rates, difficulty factors and adverse events.
Results
The first-attempt success rate (80% vs. 60%, P < 0.05) and overall success rate (92% vs. 88%) was higher in the paracarotid group, with fewer attempts (1.08 ± 0.5 vs. 1.16 ± 0.6). There were no pneumothorax (0 vs. 5%), and less accidental arterial punctures (5% vs. 18%) in the paracarotid group, but the difference was not significant statistically.
Conclusion
This study shows that the paracarotid approach of IJV cannulation is a better technique in providing a higher first-attempt success rate and has fewer complications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Mangu, H., Samantaray, A. Internal jugular vein catheterization: a comparative study of apical and paracarotid approaches. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 3), P64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11751
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11751