Skip to main content

Multicenter consensus development of a checklist for lung injury prevention


Acute lung injury (ALI) is linked to almost 75,000 US deaths annually. The syndrome is defined clinically by criteria that identify only patients with established ALI, at which point treatment options are limited and largely supportive. After 40 years and more than 25 NIH-funded trials of ALI interventions, only supportive therapy with lung protective ventilation has been associated with a mortality benefit. The US Critical Illness and Injuries Trials Group lung injury prevention subgroup seeks to standardize best practices for patients at risk of ALI. The recently validated lung injury prediction score (LIPS) identifies patients at risk of ALI, and can prompt the early use of preventative interventions. This may attenuate the progression to ALI. This study seeks expert consensus about best practices in patients at risk of ALI, as determined by their LIPS. These practices will be incorporated into a checklist for lung injury prevention. Standardization of care may protect patients against ALI development and provide a uniform background for enrollment in other ALI trials.


This study employed a Delphi selection process involving 38 intensivist participants using a web-based survey tool. In Round 1, participants were presented with 15 interventions proposed by investigators. Using a five-item Likert scale, they responded to the question: 'In your opinion as an expert, how sufficient is the evidence that this intervention reduces the risk of ALI in eligible patients?' Participants were also prompted to comment and submit additional items for consideration. In Round 2, participants followed the same approach to rate and comment on items submitted by the group. Finally, in Round 3, participants reviewed aggregated ratings and comments for all items, and voted for or against inclusion in the draft checklist. Inclusion was limited a priori to items with at least 70% agreement among participants.


Following Round 1, items submitted by participants were aggregated with minimal change into six additional items for Round 2. In Round 3, of the 21 total items, nine were endorsed by 70% of participants for inclusion in a draft checklist. These items were grouped conceptually into two domains: respiratory support and resuscitation.


The Delphi process of expert consensus can be employed to develop a checklist of time-sensitive interventions, in a manner that combines available evidence with the perspective of expert clinicians.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to JM Litell.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Litell, J., Gajic, O., Sevransky, J. et al. Multicenter consensus development of a checklist for lung injury prevention. Crit Care 16, P504 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Lung Injury
  • Acute Lung Injury
  • Additional Item
  • Expert Consensus
  • Delphi Process