Skip to main content

Efficacy of the novel heart attack centre extension pathway: a pilot study


The Barts and the London Heart Attack Centre Extension (HACX) programme was introduced to provide a direct pathway for high-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients from the A&E of a district general hospital to a tertiary intervention centre. As a result, patients have earlier access to angiography and subsequent treatment, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or nonsurgical interventions. There is no research on the effectiveness of this novel HACX programme.


Over 3 months, 33 patients transferred via the HACX pathway and 37 patients transferred via the conventional interhospital transfer pathway (IHT) were followed up. All patients with acute coronary syndrome symptoms, relevant ECG changes (ST segment depression in two or more contiguous leads >1 mm, pathological T-wave inversion in V1 to V4, a GRACE score >88 and troponin I levels >0.1 ng/ml) were discussed with the cardiology team at the interventional centre prior to immediate transfer. We assessed patient suitability for angiography, post-angiography procedures, and 3-month mortality outcomes. Data were obtained from the hospital's PAS computer system.


The average time for patients to have an angiography via the IHT pathway was 5.5 days. Of the 33 patients (mean age 61 ± 15.2 SD) transferred via HACX, 30 patients (91%) were appropriately identified for an angiogram. Seventeen patients (52%) required PCI, five patients (15%) required CABG, four patients (12%) required nonsurgical intervention, and four patients (12%) required no treatment. Controls included 37 patients (mean age 71 ± 12.6 SD) of whom 17 patients (46%) required PCI, six patients (16%) required CABG, eight patients (22%) required nonsurgical intervention and six patients (16%) required no treatment. At 3-month follow-up, 32 patients (97%) in the HACX cohort and 36 patients (97%) in the IHT cohort were alive.


HACX is an effective pathway that accurately identifies and rapidly transfers appropriate NSTEMI patients requiring early coronary revascularisation. However, there was no additional mortality benefit at 3-month follow-up compared to the conventional IHT pathway. Further studies with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required to substantiate the benefits of the HACX programme in order to consider whether this service could be implemented nationwide, or whether this is a service that does not need to exist at all.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perera, D., Hoonjan, B., Krishnathasan, K. et al. Efficacy of the novel heart attack centre extension pathway: a pilot study. Crit Care 16 (Suppl 1), P180 (2012).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
  • District General Hospital
  • Interventional Centre
  • NSTEMI Patient