Table 3 Personal job perception (N = 78)
About participation in unit staff meetings (valid for 57.7% of the sample) | |
Positive perception of the usefulness | 47 (64.4) |
Reasons for usefulness, ranked from most to least useful | |
Facilitating identification or selection of patients for inclusion | 1st |
Better integration in the team | 2nd |
Greater knowledge of diseases and care | 3rd |
Learning/expanding medical vocabulary | 4th |
Perceived positive aspects of the job (ranked from most to least appreciated) | |
Autonomy | 1st |
Relational aspects | 2nd |
Working in a team | |
Scientific interest | |
Organisation and logistical management | 5th |
Personal development | 6th |
Perceived negative aspects of the job (ranked from most to least disliked) | |
Lack of time | 1st |
Administrative procedures and paperwork | |
Constraints | 3rd |
Routine | 4th |
Isolation | |
Satisfaction with the training programme since joining the institutiona | 6 (4–7) |
About the multivalence of the job (valid for 50.0% of the sample) | |
Satisfaction with multivalence | |
Dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) |
Not much satisfied | 2 (5.1) |
Neutral opinion | 3 (7.7) |
Satisfied | 10 (25.6) |
Very satisfied | 24 (61.5) |
Sense of personal job efficiencyb | 8 (7–8) |
About the organisation of clinical research within the institution | |
Satisfaction with the institution’s overall organisationa | 5 (3–7) |
Perception of complexity of the institution’s organisation in managing the studies it sponsorsc | 7 (5–8) |
Satisfaction with personal work organisationa | 7 (5–8) |
Satisfaction with personal career management by the institutiona | 5 (2–6) |
Job stress | |
Personal stress in the jobd | 5 (2–7) |