Skip to main content

Table 1 Main features of the studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Author/year of publication

Probe 1

Probe 2

Probe placement

Patients (n)

Calibration/zeroinga

Mean difference

Standard deviation

Correlation

Datab

Group 1

1

Schickner 1992 [4]

Camino

VFC

P–V

10

+/+

9.20

7.80

NA

Reported

2

Chambers 1993 [21]

Camino

VFC

V–V

10

+/+ (EAM)

1.43

2.26

0.98

Calculated

3

Statham 1993 [22]

Camino

VFC

P–V

11

+/+

2.73

4.22

0.98

Reported

4

Gopinath 1995 [23]

Codman

VFC

V–V

25

+/+

0.50

2.60

0.97

Reported

5

Signorini 1998-2 [24]

Codman

VFC

P–V

2

+/+ (EAM)

1.81

3.75

NA

Calculated

6

Chambers 2001 [25]

Spiegelberg

VFC

P–V

11

+/+ (EAM)

0.10

4.99

NA

Reported

7

Koskinen 2005 [8]

Codman

VFC

P–V

22

+/+ (EAM)

1.20

3.32

0.79

Reported

8

Lescot 2011-1 [26]

Pressio

VFC

P–V

15

+/+ (EAM)

–0.60

3.83

NA

Reported

9

Lescot 2011-2 [26]

Codman

VFC

P–V

15

+/+ (EAM)

0.30

3.52

NA

Reported

10

Eide 2012-2 [18]

Codman

VFC

P–V

5

NA/NA

4.52

13.97

NA

Calculated

Group 2

11

Signorini 1998-1 [24]

Codman

Camino

P–P

5

+

1.58

3.36

NA

Calculated

12

Sahuquillo 1999-1 [2]

Camino

Camino

P–P

33

NA

1.80

1.10

0.95

Reported

13

Sahuquillo 1999-2 [2]

Camino

Camino

P–P

16

NA

7.50

6.40

0.85

Reported

14

Eide 2012-1 [18]

Codman

Codman

P–P

5

NA

0.64

5.59

NA

Calculated

15

Eide 2012-3 [18]

Codman

Spiegelberg

P–P

7

+

0.70

2.63

NA

Calculated

  1. Studies comparing simultaneous readings from at least two catheters for intracranial pressure monitoring classified depending on the reported use (Group 1) or not use (Group 2) of a reference standard (i.e.VFC) and reported in chronological order. Some papers reported more than one study; four are cited repeatedly. In two studies a single catheter was placed in the ventricles (V-V). This gave a typical reading through a fluid-filled system and a simultaneous measurement through a solid transducer at the tip
  2. aDescription of calibration (of the solid probe) and zeroing (of the ventricular fluid-filled catheter). (+) Calibration or zeroing is reported, (++) both calibration and zeroing are reported; NA information on calibration and zeroing maneuvers not available, (EAM) zeroing described at the external auditory meatus
  3. bIndicates how the mean intracranial pressure differences between probes and standard deviations were determined (see Methods)
  4. NA Not Available, P Parenchymal, V Ventricular, VFC Ventricular Fluid-Coupled catheter with external transducer