Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials

From: Safety and efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in patients with blunt chest trauma: a systematic review

 

Selection

bias

Performance bias

Detection

bias

Attrition bias

Reporting bias

Study

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding for patient reported outcomes

Blinding for clinical outcomes (mortality)

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Hernandez et al. (2010)

Low

Low

Uncertain

Uncertain

Uncertain

Low

Low

Gunduz et al. (2005)

High

High

High

High

High

Uncertain

Uncertain

Bolliger and Van Eeden (1990)

High

High

High

High

High

Uncertain

Uncertain

  1. aStudies were considered to be of moderate quality if there were more than two domains with uncertain risk of bias. They were considered to be of low quality if four or more domains had uncertain risk of bias or if one domain had a high risk of bias.