Septic acute kidney injury: hemodynamic syndrome, inflammatory disorder, or both?

Septic acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is the most common cause of kidney injury in the ICU. Decreased renal blood flow and inflammation have both been suggested as mechanisms of S-AKI. Benes and colleagues present a study of S-AKI in which sepsis is induced by fecal peritonitis and bacterial infusion. In this study, although decreased renal blood flow and increased renal vascular resistance were present in some of the animals that developed S-AKI, inflammatory activation without decreased renal blood flow and increased renal vascular resistance was seen in other animals. Systemic hemodynamic findings provided little information on renal hemodynamics or risk of S-AKI. The study highlights the extraordinary complexity of S-AKI and the need for clinicians to recognize our limited understanding of its pathogenesis and the weakness of the decreased perfusion paradigm as the sole explanation for the loss of renal function seen in severe sepsis.

support them is weak. Th is is especially true because renal perfusion (renal blood fl ow (RBF)) cannot be reliably measured in man. Importantly, changes in intra-RBF distribution and glomerular hemodynamics may account for loss of function, even in the presence of maintained or increased RBF [5,6]. In addition, con ventional views of the pathophysiology of S-AKI have been derived from models of acute kidney injury with limited relevance to human disease and, when diff erent models are studied, they deliver diff erent changes in RBF and function [6]. Finally, the role of nitric oxide [7] and the role of nonhemodynamic mechanisms such as apoptosis and the innate immune response remain poorly understood. It is in this context that one should assess the experiments from Matejovic's group [1].
Using two porcine models of sepsis, the investigators studied some pathophysiological phenomena associated with S-AKI. Sepsis was induced either by peritonitis, with peritoneal autologous feces inoculation, or by continuous intravenous infusion of live bacteria. Th e animals were resuscitated as needed and observed for 22 hours, simulating the clinical situation. Monitoring of global and local circulation, infl ammatory and oxidative stress markers was performed. S-AKI developed in 62% of among animals with peritonitis, compared with 40% in the bacterial infusion group, despite the fact that the peritonitis group had a signifi cantly greater systemic oxygen delivery. S-AKI animals had greater infl ammatory and oxidative stress and demonstrated a diverging late renal circulatory pattern of higher renal vascular resistance, decreased RBF, and earlier decrease in renal cortical micro circu latory blood fl ow.
Th ese fi ndings suggest that S-AKI could be induced by both renal circulatory alterations and infl ammatory injury, with the large variability in the measured parameters implying that either of these mechanisms could dominate in a given subject. Some of the renal circulatory alterations suggest that S-AKI may have a local ischemic component. However, these changes occurred late in the experiment and were preceded by deterioration of renal functional markers, and thus cannot fully explain the development of S-AKI.

Abstract
Septic acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is the most common cause of kidney injury in the ICU. Decreased renal blood fl ow and infl ammation have both been suggested as mechanisms of S-AKI. Benes and colleagues present a study of S-AKI in which sepsis is induced by fecal peritonitis and bacterial infusion. In this study, although decreased renal blood fl ow and increased renal vascular resistance were present in some of the animals that developed S-AKI, infl ammatory activation without decreased renal blood fl ow and increased renal vascular resistance was seen in other animals. Systemic hemodynamic fi ndings provided little information on renal hemodynamics or risk of S-AKI. The study highlights the extraordinary complexity of S-AKI and the need for clinicians to recognize our limited understanding of its pathogenesis and the weakness of the decreased perfusion paradigm as the sole explanation for the loss of renal function seen in severe sepsis.
Furthermore, renal vascular resistance was more than fi ve times greater in the bacterial infusion animals that developed S-AKI than in the peritonitis animals that also developed S-AKI, suggesting that increased renal vascular resistance is not necessary for the development of S-AKI. Th is provocative observation raises the possibility that S-AKI can occur within the setting of at least two diff erent renal hemodynamic phenotypes: vaso dilatory or vasoconstrictive, depending on the type of infection. Finally, a striking feature of these data is the lack of diff erence in systemic circulatory variables between S-AKI and non-S-AKI animals, suggesting that the systemic hemodynamic phenotype provides little guide to predicting the development of S-AKI or the renal hemodynamic subtype of S-AKI.
Th e above observations support the notion that, although S-AKI can be a consequence of renal ischemia under some circumstances, this is not a necessary feature. In fact, increased RBF is not unusual in S-AKI models [6], and neither renal medullary nor cortical blood fl ow is predictably altered [8]. Th e uncoupling of RBF and glomerular fi ltration can have other explanations. Eff erent arteriolar vasodilatation may increase RBF but decrease glomerular fi ltration pressure and urine produc tion [9]. Perhaps, even more provocatively, the organiza tion of the glomerular circulation may be far more complex than previously anticipated [10] and may permit direct shunting between the aff erent and eff erent arterioles (periglomerular circulation). Eff erent arteriolar vaso dila ta tion, periglomerular shunting, blood fl ow re distri bution within the kidney and, in some cases, late vasocon striction can thus all participate in the pathogenesis of S-AKI at diff erent times and in diff erent situations.
As Benes and colleagues describe, however, some of the pathophysiology behind S-AKI may be infl ammatory in nature. In fact, it is known that TNFα can induce acute kidney injury [11]. Benes and colleagues found an early increase in TNFα in animals developing S-AKI. More recent work additionally highlights the role that bactericidal antibiotic-induced release of cytokine alone can play in triggering S-AKI [12]. Other substances with a dual role (markers and mediators of tissue damage) are reactive oxygen species causing oxidative stress. Such markers increased early and were highest in pigs with peritonitisinduced S-AKI. It remains uncertain, however, to what extent cytokines and oxygen radicals are biomarkers, true mediators of injury, or both under these circumstances.
Both renal hemodynamic changes and infl ammatory activation are thus major phenomena in S-AKI as supported by Benes and colleagues' study. Th e slow evolution of sepsis, the clinically relevant resuscitation and the long observation period greatly increase the relevance of their study. Lack of data for the fi rst 12 hours of the experiment, when a porcine hypodynamic circula tion is not unusual and could contribute to S-AKI develop ment, creates some uncertainty about hemo dynamics; and the lack of tubular biomarkers of injury [13] limits our understanding of the eff ects of these models on tubular cells. Yet, the insights provided by comparing two sepsis models and by simultaneously extensively measuring circulatory and infl ammatory variables are clearly valuable. Th ese insights add much-needed data to this fi eld and highlight how much, as knowledge increases, doubt increases further.