Skip to main content
  • Matters Arising
  • Open access
  • Published:

Scoring system: use and not use from the future to present

The Original Article was published on 11 July 2024

The Original Article was published on 18 May 2024

We appreciated the letter from Wohlgemut and colleagues regarding the TIC score that we recently published in Critical Care [1, 2]. They highlight the value of this score for the early detection of traumatic coagulopathy, and recognize its ease of use upon hospital admission [2]. However, they challenged several points in our discussion regarding their Bayesian network score [3]. Briefly, they highlight the flexibility in modelling continuous variables, as well as the improved discrimination and calibration of their model. They suggest that prediction of coagulopathy is possible even with missing variables, which the TIC score theoretically cannot do. Finally, they suggest it may no longer be necessary to compromise model performance to achieve a simpler, more user-friendly model, due to advances in user interface design and user experience. It should be noted that we have deliberately chosen to compare our results with the model described by Yet B et al. because the model had good performance metrics and provides a realistic view of the causality of trauma-induced coagulopathy [3].

Their method relies on a set of data including clinical observation, physiological parameters, radiological findings and laboratory values being implemented automatically in a software application, enabling clinical decision making. Unfortunately, this does not currently match the reality of contemporary hospital care [4]. Furthermore, they argue that the Bayesian network scoring system can handle missing variables and estimate them from pre-existing data. We have chosen to include only pre-hospital parameters in our model, as they are immediately available at the time of admission or even during the pre-hospital phase of care. In our model, no parameters are missing at admission, except in rare cases when capillary hemoglobin measurement is not available. The score we described can be easily calculated mentally, driving immediate decision-making for the trauma patient [1]. The author's final point regarding the strength of Bayesian network analysis also reveals its weakness: weak diffusion. To our knowledge, the model has not been published and is therefore not reproducible by other centers, with the added difficulty of understanding and executing this analysis for the physician unfamiliar with such a model. There is also the “black box” issue, of using a model that obscures the weight of each variable, and its associated under-utilization in the medical field [5]. A simpler—but still accurate—scoring system not only provides a better understanding of the presence of trauma-induced coagulopathy, but also enables rapid and easy implementation of corrective therapy.

In conclusion, models such as Bayesian networks are currently rarely used, even though they represent a highly promising tool for the future of medicine. Until these techniques are ready for prime time, we believe it is still useful to have simple, pragmatic and easy-to-use tools to help doctors anticipate patients' needs.

Availability of data and material

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Brac L, Levrat A, Vacheron C-H, Bouzat P, Delory T, David J-S. Development and validation of the tic score for early detection of traumatic coagulopathy upon hospital admission: a cohort study. Crit Care. 2024;28:168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wohlgemut JM, Pisirir E, Stoner RS, et al. Bayesian networks may allow better performance and usability than logistic regression. Crit Care. 2024;28:234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yet B, Perkins Z, Fenton N, Tai N, Marsh W. Not just data: a method for improving prediction with knowledge. J Biomed Inform. 2014;48:28–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I. Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1347–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kyrimi E, Dube K, Fenton N, et al. Bayesian networks in healthcare: what is preventing their adoption? Artif Intell Med. 2021;116: 102079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thanks Dr Kenji Inaba (Department of surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA) for proofreading and correcting the English version of the article.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Charles-Hervé VACHERON: This author helped in writing the first draft of the manuscript, reviewing the manuscript; Jean Stephane DAVID, Albrice LEVRAT & Louis BRAC: These authors helped in reviewing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Brac.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

JSD did lectures and consulting for LFB (Les Ullis, France).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vacheron, CH., Brac, L., Levrat, A. et al. Scoring system: use and not use from the future to present. Crit Care 28, 303 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05081-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05081-0