Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of V/Q mismatch indices between absolute and relative V/Q

From: Impact of cardiac output and alveolar ventilation in estimating ventilation/perfusion mismatch in ARDS using electrical impedance tomography

 

All patients (n = 25)

Patients with VA/QC > 1 (n = 21)

Patients with VA/QC < 1 (n = 4)

Absolute V/Q

Relative V/Q

p

Absolute V/Q

Relative V/Q

p

Absolute V/Q

Relative V/Q

p

Alveolar ventilation (L min−1)

7.9 (7.5; 9.3)

  

7.9 (7.6; 9.3)

 

NA

7.7 (6.8; 9.6)

 

NA

Cardiac output (L min−1)

6.3 (5.0; 8.5)

  

5.9 (4.9; 7.7)

 

NA

9.0 (8.6; 11.4)

 

NA

Pixels with

         

Shunt (V/Q ≤ 0.1) (%)

11 (7; 15)

11 (7; 15)

1

11 (7; 15)

11 (7; 15)

1

16 (5; 30)

16 (5; 30)

NA

Low V/Q (0.1 < V/Q < 0.8) (%)

19 (6; 28.0)

23 (18; 36)

0.002

10 (5; 25)

23 (17; 35)

 < 0.0001

40 (31; 50)

22 (16; 26)

NA

Normal V/Q (0.8 ≤ V/Q ≤ 1.25) (%)

17 (11; 22)

24 (15; 45)

0.03

17 (11; 28)

28 (14; 48)

0.19

17 (9; 18)

85 (48; 109)

NA

High V/Q (1.25 < V/Q < 10) (%)

27 (12; 48)

15 (12; 22)

 < 0.001

33 (25; 54)

15 (12; 23)

 < 0.0001

9 (5; 12)

12 (8; 16)

NA

Dead space (V/Q ≥ 10) (%)

17 (7; 24)

17 (7; 24)

1

17 (6; 22)

17 (6; 22)

1

21 (12; 28)

21 (12; 28)

NA

Shunt fraction (%)

31 (12; 65)

41 (26; 67)

0.006

19 (11; 46)

37 (24; 66)

 < 0.0001

70 (64; 82)

56 (41; 70)

NA

Dead space fraction (%)

56 (41–83)

40 (23; 67)

0.0001

58 (46; 84)

40 (22; 49)

 < 0.0001

33 (30; 34)

39 (34; 40)

NA

Wasted ventilation (%)

29 (18; 35)

19 (11; 29)

 < 0.001

29 (19; 35)

16 (11; 27)

 < 0.0001

23 (17; 28)

25 (20; 30)

NA

Wasted perfusion (%)

13 (7; 22)

19 (11; 23)

0.005

11 (7; 19)

18 (11; 23)

 < 0.0001

27 (19; 34)

21 (15; 27)

NA

  1. VA, alveolar ventilation; QC, cardiac output; V/Q, ventilation to perfusion ratio at the pixel level