Skip to main content

Table 2 Physiological effects of flow settings during HFNC treatment for hypoxemic patients

From: The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula support for adult subjects: a systematic review

Author/year

Study design

N

Patients

Position

Flow (L/min)

FiO2 or SpO2

RR (breaths/min)

\(\Delta\) EELIglob (ml)

PF or SF

ROX

PEEP (cmH2O)

PTP (cmH2O s/min)

Others

Mauri et al. 2017 [7]

Prospective

17

AHRF

Semi-recumbent position

12

SpO2 90–96%

24 ± 8

Baseline

151 ± 60

NA

NA

254.3 (160.2, 359.5)

VT: 443 ± 302

MV:.1 ± 4.09

\(\Delta\) Pes: 9.4 (6.8,12.2)

30

20 ± 7

74 ± 174

177 ± 74

NA

NA

173.5 (126.4, 256.4)

VT: 437 ± 314

MV: 7.0 ± 2.8

\(\Delta\) Pes: 7.9 (5.9,11.8)

45

19 ± 7

115 ± 142

187 ± 67

NA

NA

168.9 (110.3, 217.2)

VT: 435 ± 307

MV: 7.0 ± 2.9

\(\Delta\) Pes: 8.1 (5.7, 9.5)

60

18 ± 7

230 ± 237

205 ± 61

NA

NA

151.4 (111.8, 195.6)

VT: 429 ± 301

MV: 6.9 ± 2.1

\(\Delta\) Pes: 6.8 (5.1, 9.3)

Pinkham et al. 2022 [14]

Prospective

8

Decannulated from tracheostomy tube

Not specified

0

SpO2 93–97%c

18 ± 5

NA

NA

NA

0.1 (0, 1.3)

NA

I:E: 0.75 ± 0.14

VT: 410 ± 170

MV: 6.8 ± 2.8

15

16 ± 3

NA

NA

NA

0.7 (0.2, 1.1)

NA

I:E:0.7 ± 0.18

VT: 420 ± 170

MV: 6.2 ± 2.2

30

14 ± 4

NA

NA

NA

1.0 (0.3, 3.0)

NA

I:E:0.6 ± 0.15

VT: 460 ± 220

MV: 6.4 ± 3.5

45

14 ± 4

NA

NA

NA

1.7 (0.7, 7.1)

NA

I:E: 0.5 ± 0.17

VT: 450 ± 210

MV: 5.7 ± 1.7

Delorme et al. 2017 [24]

Randomized crossover study

7

AHRF

Not specified

5 ± 4 (baseline)

SpO2 90–94%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

152 (113, 171)

WOB: 4.1 (3.0, 4.7)

\(\Delta\) Pes: 8.6 (5.3, 9.9)

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

127 (95, 139)

WOB: 3.2 (2.1, 5.6)

\(\Delta\) Pes: 7.7 (4.9, 9.8)

40

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

87 (74, 145)

WOB: 3.1 (2.5, 4.2)

\(\Delta\) Pes: 5.7 (4.0, 8.4)

60

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

65 (34, 99)

WOB: 1.9 (1.0, 2.6)

\(\Delta\) Pes: 2.1 (1.9, 4.5)

Zhang et al. 2020 [9]

Prospective

24

AHRF or high risk for AHRF after extubation

Semi-recumbent position

0

FiO2 0.30

22 ± 6

Baseline

NA

22.4 ± 5.4

NA

NA

NA

20

20 ± 4

7.2 (− 5.1, 18.7)d

NA

23.9 ± 5.2

NA

NA

NA

40

20 ± 3

10.6 (− 3.4, 42)d

NA

23.5 ± 4.4

NA

NA

NA

60

21 ± 5

26.3 (10.7,60.8)d

NA

22.2 ± 4.3

NA

NA

NA

Li et al. 2021 [6]

Prospective

49

AHRF

Not specified

Matching PTIF

FiO2 ≥ 0.40 and SpO2 of 90–97%

23 ± 7

NA

161 ± 51

7.5 ± 3.2

NA

NA

NA

10 L/min above PTIF

23 ± 7

NA

181 ± 61

8.5 ± 4.0

NA

NA

NA

20 L/min above PTIF

22 ± 6

NA

201 ± 67

9.8 ± 4.7

NA

NA

NA

30 L/min above PTIF

23 ± 6

NA

207 ± 70

10.0 ± 4.7

NA

NA

NA

Basile et al. 2020 [8]

Prospective

12

AHRF

Semi-recumbent position

0.5 L/kg/min

SpO2 90–96%

20 ± 6

Baseline

194 ± 96

NA

NA

NA

NA

1.0 L/kg/min

17 ± 5

366.7 ± 1264c

211 ± 106

NA

NA

NA

NA

1.5 L/kg/min

18 ± 6

760.8 ± 1096c

219 ± 118

NA

NA

NA

NA

Butt et al. 2021 [44]

Retrospective

19

Post-extubation

Not specified

20

SpO2 92–97%

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 6.9 (6.2, 7.7)ab

30

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 8.6 (8.0,9.0)ab

40

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 8.58 (8.0, 9.0)ab

50

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 6.8 (6.3, 7.2)ab

60

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 3.0 (2.3, 3.7)ab

Parke et al. 2013 [45]

Prospective

15

Cardiac surgery

Not specified

30

Not specified

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.01 ± 1.18

NA

MAP: 1.5 ± 0.6

MPP:1.71 ± 0.73

MEP: 2.1 ± 0.83

MIP: 0.55 ± 0.38

40

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.81 ± 1.45

NA

MAP 2.2 ± 0.8

MPP:2.48 ± 0.94

MEP: 2.88 ± 1.04

MIP: 1.11 ± 0.51

50

NA

NA

NA

NA

4.86 ± 1.79

NA

MAP: 3.1 ± 1.2

MPP: 3.41 ± 1.24

MEP: 3.81 ± 1.33

MIP: 1.77 ± 0.69

Mauri et al. 2019 [10]

Retrospective

57

AHRF

Semi-recumbent position

30

SpO2 90–96%

NA

437 ± 314

NA

10.2 (7.2, 13.3)

NA

NA

NA

60

NA

429 ± 301

NA

11.1 (8.8, 13.9)

NA

NA

NA

Natalini et al. 2019 [46]

Prospective

5

Decannulated from tracheostomy tube

Not specified

10

SpO2 92–98%

NA

NA

NA

NA

Nasal 3.2 (2.3, 5.9)b

Tracheal 0.8 (0.5, 1.2)b

NA

MEP nasal: 2.6 (1.6, 5.5)b MEP tracheal: 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)b

30

NA

NA

NA

NA

Nasal 3.3 (2.8, 5.5)b

Tracheal 1.3 (0.9,1.6)b

NA

MEP nasal: 2.6 (1.9, 4.2)b

MEP tracheal: 0.9 (0.6, 1.1) b

50

NA

NA

NA

NA

Nasal 5.1 (4.2, 7.7)b

Tracheal 1.8 (1.4,2.2)b

NA

MEP nasal: 3.9 (3.1, 6)b MEP tracheal: 1.2 (1,1.5)b

Mauri et al. 2018 [50]

Prospective

40

AHRF

Semi-recumbent position

30 (Temp 31)

SpO2 92–98%

22 (18, 29)

NA

238 (192, 246)

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 3 (2, 5)

30 (Temp 37)

23 (19, 29)

NA

240 (190, 248)

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 4 (2, 5)

60 (Temp 31)

22 (19, 25)

NA

240 (196, 248)

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 3 (1, 5)

30 (Temp 37)

23 (19, 26)

NA

240 (196, 248)

NA

NA

NA

Comfort: 3 (2,5)

  1. FiO2 Fraction of inspired oxygen (%),SpO SpO2 Saturation of oxygenation using pulse oximeter (%), RR respiratory rate (breath/min), \(\Delta\) EELIglob global change in end-expiratory lung impedance measured by electrical impedance tomography, PF PaO2/FiO2, SF SpO2/FiO2, ROX index [(SpO2/FiO2)/RR], PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure measured by pharyngeal or tracheal catheter, PTP esophageal pressure-time product per minute (cmH2O·s/min), VT tidal volume (ml), MV minute ventilation (L/min), \(\Delta\) Pes esophageal pressure swings (cmH2O), I:E inspiratory to expiratory ratio, Comfort respiratory comfort level measured by a scale, MPP mean plateau pressure (cmH2O), MEP mean expiratory pressure (cmH2O), MIP mean inspiratory pressure (cmH2O), MAP mean airway pressure (cmH2O), Temp temperature (°C), AHRF acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, PTIF peak tidal inspiratory flow, NA not available
  2. aValues reported as 95% CI
  3. bValues extracted from graph using graph reader Website
  4. cValues reported directly from the author
  5. dValues are reported as % of change from baseline