Skip to main content

Table 4 Distress and moral distress during COVID-19 pandemic

From: Palliative care practice and moral distress during COVID-19 pandemic (PEOpLE-C19 study): a national, cross-sectional study in intensive care units in the Czech Republic

 

Results

(N = 313)

Major sources of distress*, n (%)

 Spending less time with patients

168 (53.7)

 Inconsistent opinions of physicians regarding comfort care

133 (42.5)

 Insufficient communication with patient’s family

74 (23.6)

 Inconsistent opinions of nurses on comfort care

72 (23.0)

 Insufficient communication about goals of treatment within the team

69 (22.0)

I was exposed to moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, n (%)

 Strongly agree

75 (24.0)

 Somewhat agree

87 (27.8)

 Do not know

23 (7.3)

 Somewhat disagree

92 (29.4)

 Strongly disagree

28 (8.9)

 Median (IQR)

2 (2–4)

Level of moral distress was comparable to situation before COVID-19 pandemic, n (%)a

 Strongly agree

5 (3.1)

 Somewhat agree

24 (14.8)

 Do not know

11 (6.8)

 Somewhat disagree

82 (50.6)

 Strongly disagree

39 (24.1)

Major sources of moral distress*, n (%)a

 Work intensity—psychological exhaustion

27 (16.7)

 Work intensity—physical exhaustion

23 (14.2)

 Cooperation with not qualified colleagues

20 (12.3)

 Changes in the standards of care

19 (11.7)

 Severity of condition/prognosis of admitted patients

16 (9.9)

 Personal interactions at the ICU

16 (9.9)

 Prioritisation of care due to resource scarcity situation

16 (9.9)

 Responsibility for insufficiently qualified colleagues

14 (8.6)

 Work intensity—risk of infection

10 (6.2)

 Organisational/institutional problems

6 (3.7)

 Administration of experimental treatments

5 (3.1)

  1. COVID-19 Coronavirus disease, IQR interquartile range, ICU intensive care unit
  2. aPercentage based on number of HCPs who answered ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Somewhat agree’ on the question ‘I was exposed to moral distress during the Covid-19 pandemic’
  3. *More than one answer possible