Skip to main content

Table 2 Prognostic performance of single prognostic methods as recommended by ERC/ESICM

From: External validation of the 2020 ERC/ESICM prognostication strategy algorithm after cardiac arrest

 

N

AUC

Sensitivity

Specificity

TP

TN

FP

FN

A. Unconscious patients at ≥ 72 h after ROSC without confounders

 GCS_M ≤ 3

660

0.707 (0.644–0.770)

89.9 (87.3–92.3)

69.0 (56.9–79.5)

530

49

22

59

 No PR/CR

518

0.661 (0.588–0.734)

62.9 (58.2–67.4)

100 (94.9–100)

281

71

0

166

 No SSEP N20

150

0.864 (0.805–0.923)

72.7 (64.3–80.1)

100 (81.5–100)

96

18

0

36

 NSE > 60

363

0.867 (0.822–0.912)

78.8 (73.8–83.3)

94.6 (85.1–98.9)

242

53

3

65

 Highly malignant EEG

249

0.796 (0.741–0.851)

59.2 (52.2–66.0)

100 (91.8–100)

122

43

0

84

 Poor CT

602

0.619 (0.564–0.673)

32.8 (28.7–37.1)

90.9 (83.4–95.8)

165

90

9

338

 Poor DWI

332

0.890 (0.856–0.924)

78.0 (72.7–82.7)

100.0 (92.9–100)

220

50

0

62

B. Unconscious patients with GCS_M ≤ 3 at ≥ 72 h after ROSC without confounders

 No PR/CR

471

0.821 (0.778–0.864)

64.1 (59.4–68.7)

100 (91.0–100)

277

39

0

155

 No SSEP N20

133

0.874 (0.799–0.949)

74.8 (66.3–82.1)

100 (54.1–100)

95

3

0

32

 NSE 60

319

0.905 (0.870–0.939)

81.0 (76.0–85.3)

100 (86.3–100)

238

25

0

56

 Highly malignant EEG

224

0.802 (0.738–0.866)

60.4 (53.3–67.2)

100 (84.6–100)

122

22

0

80

 Poor CT

537

0.601 (0.527–0.674)

33.6 (29.4–38.0)

86.5 (74.2–94.4)

163

45

7

322

 Poor DWI

298

0.897 (0.860–0.934)

79.5 (74.2–84.1)

100 (86.3–100)

217

25

0

56

  1. AUC, area under the curve; TP, true positive; TN, true negative; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; PR, pupillary light reflex; CR, corneal reflex; SSEP, somatosensory evoked potential; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; EEG, electroencephalogram; CT, computed tomography; DWI, diffusion-weighted image