From: Sepsis Performance Improvement Programs: From Evidence Toward Clinical Implementation
Pre-implementation phase: |
• Retrospective and prospective evaluation of the current situation to identify opportunities for improvement. We noted: |
 - Sequential ED consultations by various specialists, which delayed appropriate care. |
 - Non-urgent triage codes in (elderly) patients with suspected sepsis. |
• Involvement of patient representatives. |
 Interventions: |
• Screening tool selected: MEWS (already in use and thus easy to incorporate). |
• Process changes: Initiation of a sepsis response team, standardized notes and EHR order sets, daily audit and weekly feedback. |
• Education: Launch of a dedicated website, pocket cards, talks at morning hand-over. |
 Lessons learned so far: |
• Early challenges include behavior change and trust among all stakeholders that the new workflow will be efficient and may improve outcomes. |
• The engagement of only a few clinical leaders per department seems insufficient for successful implementation, especially in the dynamic environment of an ED. |
ED emergency department, ICU intensive care unit, MEWS Modified Early Warning Score, EHR electronic health record |