Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of thiamine as adjunctive therapy in COVID-19 critically ill patients: a two-center propensity score matched study

Critical Care volume 25, Article number: 223 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thiamine is a precursor of the essential coenzyme thiamine pyrophosphate required for glucose metabolism; it improves the immune system function and has shown to reduce the risk of several diseases. The role of thiamine in critically ill septic patient has been addressed in multiple studies; however, it’s role in COVID-19 patients is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of thiamine as an adjunctive therapy on mortality in COVID-19 critically ill patients.

Methods

This is a two-center, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study for critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID19. All patients aged 18 years or older admitted to ICUs between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, with positive PCR COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. We investigated thiamine use as an adjunctive therapy on the clinical outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 738 critically ill patients with COVID-19 who had been admitted to ICUs were included in the study. Among 166 patients matched using the propensity score method, 83 had received thiamine as adjunctive therapy. There was significant association between thiamine use with in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.19–0.78; P value = 0.008) as well as the 30-day mortality (OR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.18–0.78; P value = 0.009). Moreover, patients who received thiamine as an adjunctive therapy were less likely to have thrombosis during ICU stay [OR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.04–0.88), P value = 0.03].

Conclusion

Thiamine use as adjunctive therapy may have potential survival benefits in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Additionally, it was associated with a lower incidence of thrombosis. Further interventional studies are required to confirm these findings.

Introduction

With the rapid spread of the disease, as well as the high mortality rates among critically ill patients, there are many studies with different methodology approaches conducted among COVID-19 patients to investigate the effectiveness of many medications (e.g., steroids, antivirals, immunomodulators) and respiratory support strategies (e.g., prone position, volume protected strategy) [1,2,3]. Several proposed vitamins and trace elements therapies are currently under investigation, such as ascorbic acid and zinc [4,5,6,7]. However, the role of other vitamins, especially thiamine in COVID-19 critically ill patients, is still unclear.

Thiamine is a precursor of the essential coenzyme thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) required for glucose metabolism; it improves the immune system function and has been shown to reduce the risk of several diseases [8]. Besides that, thiamine diphosphate (TDP)-dependent enzymes are a vast group of proteins that contribute to many catabolism reactions of enzymes, along with neurotransmitters biosynthesis and antioxidant activity [9]. Thiamine deficiency is a serious medical condition that may lead to many complications requiring medical interventions such as Wernicke's encephalopathy, delirium, and beriberi [10,11,12].

The role of thiamine in COVID-19 patients is still unclear; however, its role in critically ill patients has been addressed in multiple studies [13,14,15]. A randomized controlled trial by Moskowitz et al. shows that thiamine was associated with significantly lower lactate levels, serum creatinine and a possible decrease in 30-day mortality [13]. In addition, another observational study shows that thiamine administration within 24 hours  was associated with an improved possibility of lactic acid clearance and reduced 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with septic shock [14].

The question remains about the thiamine role in COVID-19 critically ill patients. Antibodies and, importantly, T-cells are required to eliminate the SARS-CoV-2 virus; thiamine deficiency can potentially result in inadequate antibody responses and more severe symptoms [8]. Thiamine also works as a carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme inhibitor; thus, high doses of thiamine given to patients at the early stages of COVID-19 could limit hypoxia and decrease hospitalization [16]. Additionally, an in-vitro study found that high-dose thiamine lowers the T-helper cells (Th-17) cell pro-inflammatory response believed to be associated with the COVID-19 cytokine storm [17].

As of July 15, 2020, over 300 COVID-19 patients were treated with a protocol named MATH+ protocol which combines a range of substances: methylprednisolone, ascorbic acid, thiamine, heparin and several additional components, including melatonin, zinc, vitamin D, atorvastatin and famotidine [4]. Unfortunately, no current studies specifically investigate thiamine's effect in COVID-19 patients to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, our study aims to determine the association between thiamine use as an adjunctive therapy and the clinical outcomes in COVID-19 critically ill patients.

Methods

Study design

A retrospective study of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 in two-tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia between March 1 and December 31, 2020. All patients who met the inclusion criteria during the study period were included. Eligible patients have been divided into two groups based on thiamine use as adjunctive therapy during ICU stay; there were no pre-defined criteria at the two centers for thiamine initiation. Intravenous (IV) or enteral) thiamine was given empirically and not based on baseline thiamine levels. Patients were observed during their hospital stay until discharge or in-hospital death, whichever occurred first. The study was approved by the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Institutional Review Board (IRB), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Study Number: RC20/589/R).

Participants

Patients who were 18 years of age or older and admitted to ICU with confirmed COVID-19 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal or throat swabs were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if the ICU length of stay (LOS) was less than a day or labeled as "Do-Not-Resuscitate" code status within 24 hours of ICU admission.

Setting

This study was conducted in two large, tertiary governmental hospitals; King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh (KAMC-RD) and King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah (KAUH-JD). The ICUs admit medical, surgical, trauma, burn and transplant patients and operate as a closed unit with 24/7 on-site coverage by critical care board-certified intensivists. The distributions of total enrolled patients were 77% and 23% in KAMC-CR and KAUH-JD, respectively. The primary site was KAMC-RD.

Data collection

Data gathered from the patients' electronic medical records included demographic data (see Additional file 1), thiamine use, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC). Comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory tests, the needs for mechanical ventilation (MV), MV parameters (e.g., PaO2/FiO2 ratio, FiO2 requirement) and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin) within 24 hours  of ICU admission were recorded. Additionally, ICU complication (s) during ICU stay (e.g., Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), thrombosis/infarction), ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration and ICU/in-hospital mortality were collected for eligible patients.

Outcomes

The primary endpoints were determining the association between using thiamine as adjunctive therapy with the in-hospital and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The secondary endpoints include evaluation of MV duration, length of stay and complication (s) during ICU stay (i.e., acute kidney injury, acute liver injury, respiratory failure and thrombosis/ infarction).

Definition(s)

  • The acute kidney injury was defined using the AKIN definition [18].

  • Thrombosis/ infarction was defined using ICD10-CM code (i.e., Myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis) [6].

  • Respiratory failure was defined as either hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO2 < 60 mm Hg with a normal or low arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) or hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg) that requires mechanical ventilation [16].

  • Acute liver injury, defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) exceeds three times the normal upper limit (ULN) or doubled in patients with elevated baseline ALT [6].

Data management and statistical analysis

Categorical variables were reported using numbers and percentages, whereas continuous variables reported using means with standard deviation (SD) or medians with interquartile range (IQR) when appropriate. The normality assumptions were assessed for all numerical variables using a statistical test (i.e., Shapiro–Wilk test) and graphical representation (i.e., histograms and Q–Q plots). We compared categorical variables using the Chi-square or Fisher exact test, normally distributed numerical variables with the Mann–Whitney U test.

Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Multivariable logistic regression and negative binomial regression were used to determine the relationship between thiamine use and different outcomes considered in this study. The odds ratios (OR) and estimates with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for the associations. No imputation was made for missing data as the cohort of patients in our study was not derived from random selection.

Propensity score matching procedures (Proc PS match) (SAS, Cary, NC) were used to match patients who received thiamine with patients who did not based on  patient’s baseline severity scores (i.e., APACHE II, SOFA, and NUTRIC scores), systemic use of corticosteroids and study centers. A greedy nearest neighbor matching method was used in which one patient in the control group was matched with each patient in the thiamine (treated) group. This eventually produces the smallest within-pair difference among all available pairs with treated patients. These patients were matched only if the difference in the logits of the propensity scores for pairs of patients from the two groups was less than or equal to 0.5 times the pooled estimate of the standard deviation. We considered a P value of < 0.05 statistically significant and used SAS version 9.4 for all statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 738 critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICUs at the two governmental hospitals were included in the study. Thiamine was given to 88 patients, whereas 650 patients did not receive thiamine. A total of 166 patients were included after propensity score matching had been conducted using baseline severity scores, systemic use of corticosteroids and study centers. The median (Q1, Q3) dose of thiamine given per day was 100 mg (50, 200) with a median duration of seven days. The majority of patients received thiamine by intravenous administration (57%).

Demographic and clinical characteristics

Among critically ill patients admitted to ICUs, the patients' average age was 60 years (± 15). A total of 531 (72%) patients were male (Table 1, Additional file 1). Diabetes mellitus (61%) was the most common coexisting illness, followed by hypertension (56.8%) and dyslipidemia (23.2%). Coexisting illness between the two groups was not statistically significant (Table 2, Additional file 2).

Table 1 Regression analysis for the outcomes
Full size table
Table 2 Regression analysis for ICU complication(s) during ICU stay
Full size table

The baseline severity scores (i.e., APACHE II, SOFA and NUTRIC scores), mechanical ventilation (MV) needs within 24 h of ICU admission, and laboratory tests (i.e., INR, Fibrinogen, CRP, Ferritin, HCT, pH) were significantly higher among patients who did not receive thiamine during ICU stay. On the other hand, systematic corticosteroids use during ICU stay, and phosphorus levels were higher in the thiamine group. However, after conducting propensity score matching, most of these baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups (Table 1, Additional file 1).

Study outcomes

There were fifteen patients (18.1%) who died during ICU stay among the thiamine group, compared with thirty patients (36.1%) in the other group. In other words, patients who received thiamine as adjunctive therapy during ICU stay had a lower 30-day mortality rate by 63% [OR (95% CI): 0.37 (0.18, 0.78), P value = 0.009] (Table 1). Additionally, thiamine use was associated significantly with a lower in-hospital mortality rate by 61% [OR (95% CI): 0.39 (0.19,0.78), P value = 0.008]. The overall survival probabilities were higher during hospital stay among patients who received thiamine before and after propensity score-matched (Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Overall survival plot during the hospital stay comparing patients who received thiamine (88 patients) as adjunctive therapy versus the control group (650 patients)—before PS matching. b Overall survival plot during the hospital stay comparing patients who received thiamine (83 patients) as adjunctive therapy versus the control group (83 patients)—after PS matching

Full size image

The duration of mechanical ventilation (Beta estimate − 0.13 CI − 0.54, 0.27; P value = 0.51), ICU length of stay (LOS) (Beta estimate 0.11 CI − 0.19, 0.39; P value = 0.48) and hospital LOS (Beta estimate 0.08 CI − 0.17, 0.33; P value = 0.52) did not differ significantly in patients who received thiamine as adjunctive therapy compared to patients who did not (Table 1).

Complications during ICU stay

Critically ill patients who received thiamine as an adjunctive therapy were less likely to have thrombosis during ICU stay by 81% [OR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.04, 0.88), P value = 0.03] (Table 2). Moreover, acute kidney injury [OR (95% CI) 0.91 (0.49, 1.68)] and liver Injury [OR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.30, 2.87)] were lower in the thiamine group by 9% and 7%, respectively. However, the differences were not statistically significant (Table 2).

Discussion

Our study is a two-center, non-interventional retrospective study of critically ill patients admitted to ICUs with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. It investigates the correlation between thiamine use as adjunctive therapy and the clinical outcomes. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the thiamine group with a P value of (P = 0.009) after using propensity score matching that takes into consideration the use of the corticosteroid since it showed survival benefits in the recovery trial [26].

Our findings agree with a substantial number of studies published over the past decades and reported a survival benefit with thiamine in non-COVID19 critically ill patients. However, there are no current trials that directly investigate the effect of thiamine in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Woolum et al. proved the relation between early thiamine administration to critically ill patients with septic shock during the first 24 hours  of admission with rapid lactate clearance and decreased 28-day mortality rates [14]. However, the recent VITAMINS trial tested the HAT protocol (hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid and thiamine) in critically ill patients with septic shock and found no survival benefit [21].

Severe COVID-19-infected patients may develop malnutrition and risk for refeeding syndrome due to low food intake prior to ICU admission [22]. Thiamine deficiency plays a major role in malnutrition in critically ill patients, which leads to the inability to create adenosine triphosphate (ATP), inability to use oxygen, high-output cardiac failure, cardiovascular collapse and death when untreated [23]. One retrospective observational study conducted in Wuhan found that critically ill COVID-19 patients with higher Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS) had a higher risk of mortality and longer hospital stay [22]. Preadmission nutritional status in our patients has been assessed using NUTRIC score due to the unavailability of NRS-2002-related information (e.g., weight loss history, food intake history prior to ICU admission). Moreover, phosphorus levels were evaluated in our cohort for further nutrition assessment, the mean phosphorus level was 1.05 (0.36) mmol/L and 1.16 (0.38) mmol/L in control and thiamine group (P = 0.07), respectively. The preadmission low nutrition status due to COVID-19 infection combined with the known low intake of some micronutrients (such as zinc and selenium) in the Saudi population might explain the benefits of thiamine observed in our study [11, 24].

The ICU length of stay was not statistically significant between the groups (P-value = 0.48), with a median duration of eight days. A lack of studies assessed the thiamine's impact on ICU LOS in COVID-19 critically ill patients. Conversely, a retrospective study by Mitchell et al. investigates the benefits of thiamine, vitamin C, and hydrocortisone as a combination in septic patients and found a significant difference in the ICU LOS [25].

In our data, the incidence of AKI was lower in the thiamine group, which may explain a kidney protective effect but was not statistically significant. Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent complications during critical illness and could contribute to a malnutrition state and impaired patients' immunity [27]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that serum creatinine levels were lower in patients who received a high dose of thiamine and were less likely to have kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) [13].

Interestingly, thiamine use was found to be associated with a statistically significant reduction in thrombosis by 81% compared to the control group [OR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.040, 0.884), P value = 0.03]. The exact mechanism for thrombosis reduction observed in our cohort with thiamine use is unknown. This finding worth further investigation and should trigger future research to address the precise impact of thiamine on the prevention of thrombosis in COVID-19 critically ill patients.

Our study's uniqueness lies in the lack of extensive well-conducted studies connecting thiamine administration's effect directly to a positive impact on mortality rates in COVID 19 critically ill patients. However, the study may have been affected by several limitations, including our design observational nature, and some residual confounding factors are still possible. Therefore, we conducted several analyses to control these variables using multivariable regression adjustment after propensity score matching. Additionally, thiamine initiation in our centers was primarily based on clinical judgment; thus, treating physicians' bias toward using one treatment regimen versus another cannot be ruled out. Also, thiamine levels were not measured for patients neither initially on admission nor during ICU stay.

Thiamine has a good safety profile, and readily available at low cost; therefore, it can be considered as a part of COVID-19 critically ill patients' therapeutic management protocols. Further interventional studies are required to confirm our findings.

Conclusion

Thiamine use as adjunctive therapy may have potential survival benefits in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Additionally, it was associated with a lower incidence of thrombosis. Systemic thiamine administration could be considered as a part of COVID-19 management upon ICU admission.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ICUs:

Intensive care units

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

Vitamin B1:

Thiamine

LOS:

Length of stay

APACHE II:

Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II

SOFA:

Sequential organ failure assessment

NUTRIC:

Nutrition risk in the critically ill

References

  1. Slessarev M, Cheng J, Ondrejicka M, et al. Patient self-proning with high-flow nasal cannula improves oxygenation in COVID-19 pneumonia. Can J Anesth. 2020;67:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Telias I, Katira BH, Brochard L. Is the prone position helpful during spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19? JAMA. 2020;323:2265–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jovic TH, Ali SR, Ibrahim N, et al. Could vitamins help in the fight against COVID-19? Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, et al. Clinical and scientific rationale for the “MATH+” hospital treatment protocol for COVID-19. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(2):135–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620973585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang J, Rao X, Li Y, et al. Pilot trial of high-dose vitamin C in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00792-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinicaltrials.gov. RCT, Double Blind, Placebo to Evaluate the Effect of Zinc and Ascorbic Acid Supplementation in COVID-19 Positive Hospitalized Patients in BSMMU—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov; 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04558424?term=zinc&cond=Covid19&draw=2&rank=2. Accessed 6 June 2021.

  7. Carr AC. A new clinical trial to test high-dose vitamin C in patients with COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24:133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02851-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amrein K, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Berger MM. Vitamin therapy in critically ill patients: focus on Thiamine, vitamin C, and vitamin D. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(11):1940–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fattal-Valevski A. Thiamine (vitamin B1). J Evid Based Comple Altern Med. 2011;16(1):12–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McKenzie CA, et al. Parenteral thiamine for prevention and treatment of delirium in critically ill adults: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2020;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Attaluri P, Castillo A, Edriss H, Nugent K. Thiamine deficiency: an important consideration in critically ill patients. Am J Med Sci. 2018;356(4):382–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luger M, et al. Influence of intravenous thiamine supplementation on blood lactate concentration prior to cardiac surgery: a double-blinded, randomised controlled pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol EJA. 2015;32(8):543–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moskowitz A, Andersen LW, Cocchi MN, et al. Thiamine as a renal protective agent in septic shock. A secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(5):737–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolum JA, Abner EL, Kelly A, et al. Effect of thiamine administration on lactate clearance and mortality in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(11):1747–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marik PE, Khangoora V, Rivera R, et al. Hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and Thiamine for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective before-after study. Chest. 2017;151(6):1229–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez-Roisin R. Pulmonary gas exchange in acute respiratory failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1994;11(1):5–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vatsalya V, Li F, Frimodig JC, et al. Therapeutic prospects for Th-17 cell immune storm syndrome and neurological symptoms in COVID-19: thiamine efficacy and safety, in-vitro evidence and pharmacokinetic profile. medRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.23.20177501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin C. Acute kidney injury classification: AKIN and RIFLE criteria in critical patients. World J Crit Care Med. 2012;1(2):40. https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v1.i2.40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/ICD-10cmguidelines-FY2021-COVID-update-January-2021-508.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2021.

  20. Al Sulaiman K, Aljuhani O, Eljaaly K, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a multicenter cohort study. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;105:180–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujii T, Luethi N, Young PJ, et al. Effect of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine vs hydrocortisone alone on time alive and free of vasopressor support among patients with septic shock: the VITAMINS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(5):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.22176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao X, Li Y, Ge Y, et al. Evaluation of nutrition risk and its association with mortality risk in severely and critically ill COVID-19 patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021;45(1):32–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singer M. Mitochondrial function in sepsis: acute phase versus multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(9 SUPPL.):S441–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000278049.48333.78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Saleh IA, Al-Jaloud A, Al-Doush I, El-Din G. The distribution of selenium levels in Saudi dairy farms: a preliminary report from Al-Kharj. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 1999;18:37–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell AB, Ryan TE, Gillion AR, et al. Vitamin C and thiamine for sepsis and septic shock. Am J Med. 2020;133(5):635–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2021436.

  27. Ostermann M, Summers J, Lei K, Card D, Harrington DJ, Sherwood R, Turner C, Dalton N, Peacock J, Bear DE. Micronutrients in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury—a prospective study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Mr. Ahmed S. Al Asseri for his support during the manuscript editing.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)/King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Khalid Al Sulaiman, Maram Al Dossari, Majed Al Jeraisy, Shmeylan Al Harbi, Abdulmalik Al Katheri, Fahad Al Eidan, Abdulkareem M. Al Bekairy, Nouf Al Qahtani & Mashael Al Muqrin

  2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Ohoud Aljuhani

  3. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Asma Alshahrani

  4. Pharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Aisha Alharbi & Rahmah Algarni

  5. College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Fahad Al Eidan & Ghassan Al Ghamdi

  6. Intensive Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ghassan Al Ghamdi

  7. College of Pharmacy, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Khalid Al Sulaiman, Majed Al Jeraisy, Shmeylan Al Harbi, Abdulmalik Al Katheri & Abdulkareem M. Al Bekairy

  8. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ramesh Vishwakarma

Authors
  1. Khalid Al Sulaiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ohoud Aljuhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maram Al Dossari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Asma Alshahrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aisha Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rahmah Algarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Majed Al Jeraisy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shmeylan Al Harbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abdulmalik Al Katheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fahad Al Eidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Abdulkareem M. Al Bekairy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nouf Al Qahtani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mashael Al Muqrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ramesh Vishwakarma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ghassan Al Ghamdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to data collections, analysis, drafted, revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Al Sulaiman.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved on November 19, 2020, by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) and Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA)—Institutional Review Board, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Study Number: RC20/589/R). Participants' confidentiality was strictly observed throughout the study using the anonymous unique serial number for each subject and restricting data only to the investigators. Informed consent was not required due to the research's method as per the governmental and local research center's policy.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No author has a conflict of interest in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1

. Summary of demography and baseline characteristics

Additional file 2: Table 2

. Co-existing illness

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Sulaiman, K., Aljuhani, O., Al Dossari, M. et al. Evaluation of thiamine as adjunctive therapy in COVID-19 critically ill patients: a two-center propensity score matched study. Crit Care 25, 223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03648-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03648-9

Keywords

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535