Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographics of the patient cohorts for each database

From: Day-to-day progression of vital-sign circadian rhythms in the intensive care unit

Cohort

Men1

Women1

No.

Age

LOS

OASIS

No.

Age

LOS

OASIS

MIMIC SRV

1658

56.7 ± 15.7

7.3 ± 4.4

32 ± 8

1048

56.3 ± 16.6

7.5 ± 5.6

32 ± 8

MIMIC DCS

1023

68.5 ± 14.7

12.8 ± 10.8

38 ± 8

862

71.8 ± 14.4

11.9 ± 9.4

39 ± 8

eICU SRV

3175

57.1 ± 15.9

7.4 ± 8.4

30 ± 10

2335

57.6 ± 16.6

6.9 ± 4.0

32 ± 10

eICU DCS

1719

67.3 ± 15.1

10.1 ± 8.1

39 ± 10

1431

68.8 ± 14.7

10.0 ± 11.0

40 ± 10

PICRAM SRV

1082

58.4 ± 16.8

11.6 ± 9.9

38 ± 10

728

57.7 ± 17.1

11.5 ± 10.62

39 ± 10

PICRAM DCS

396

65.3 ± 14.8

13.2 ± 12.2

42 ± 10

215

64.6 ± 15.0

12.0 ± 11.32

44 ± 9

  1. 1Results presented as mean ± SD.
  2. 2All metrics apart from LOS in women in PICRAM exhibit significant differences (p < 0.01) between the SRV and DCS cohorts for a given database