Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Critical Care

Fig. 3

From: Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fig. 3

Forest plot for percentage error. Forest plot showing the results of the meta-analysis for the percentage error (dots) with 95%-confidence interval (bars) per individual study in relation to the overall random effects model-derived pooled estimate (vertical dashed line). Heterogeneity is presented with Cochran’s Q and I2. CO, cardiac output; N, number of patients per study. Costa and colleagues [36], Rödig and colleagues [65], and Zöllner and colleagues [72] are treated as two studies in the analysis (A and B)

Back to article page

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535