Table 5 Change parameter of High potential of recruitment (HPR) group vs Low potential of recruitment (LPR) group at different follow
Variables | Baseline | 20 L/min | 40 L/min | 60 L/min | Trend—p | Mauchly’s test of sphericity p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔEELIgl (%) | ||||||
HPR group | Baseline | 7.03 (− 4.49,21.30) | 30.66 (0.33,47.35)a,b | 32.31 (10.51,102.96)a,b | 0.007 | < 0.0001 |
LPR group | Baseline | 7.46 (− 7.67,17.80) | 5.56 (− 9.20,28.96) | 43.95 (11.53,71.69) | 0.003 | 0.754 |
ΔVTgl (%) | ||||||
HPR group | Baseline | 9.98 (− 1.13,21.14) | 11.62 (− 8.21,20.99) | 4.27 (− 6.75,16.14) | 0.194 | 0.023 |
LPR group | Baseline | 4.80 (− 25.12,41.99) | 1.64 (− 9.57,20.06) | 0.12 (− 3.42,38.45) | 0.305 | 0.242 |
Recruitment region (pixels) | ||||||
HPR group | Baseline | 12 (7,24)a,¶ | 17 (10,41)a,b,¶ | 20 (16,42)a,b,c,¶ | < 0.0001 | 0.013 |
LPR group | Baseline | 0 (0,5) | 0 (0,8) | 0 (0,8) | 0.305 | 0.242 |
Overdistension (pixels) | ||||||
HPR group | 10 (5,31) | 10 (5,30) | 11 (1,33) | 13 (3,33) | 0.456 | 0.003 |
LPR group | 16 (9,22) | 18 (6,27) | 22 (4,28) | 16 (8,26) | 0.159 | 0.006 |
Δoverdistension (pixels) | ||||||
HPR group | Baseline | 1 (− 2,4) | 1 (− 1,6) | 3 (1,9) | 0.456 | 0.003 |
LPR group | Baseline | 1 (− 4,8) | 1 (− 4 ,10) | 4 (− 1,7) | 0.159 | 0.006 |
Tidal recruitment/derecruitment (pixels) | ||||||
HPR group | 15 (4,38) | 8 (0,15) | 15 (1,33) | 5 (2,18) | 0.096 | 0.77 |
LPR group | 11 (7,51) | 10 (7,27) | 19 (10,33) | 12 (6,13) | 0.572 | 0.08 |
RR (bpm) | ||||||
HPR group | 21 (19,25) | 20 ± 3 | 20 ± 3 | 21 ± 4 | 0.029 | 0.390 |
LPR group | 20 (17,25) | 21 ± 5 | 20 ± 3 | 23 ± 5 | 0.473 | 0.270 |
ROX index | ||||||
HPR group | 22 ± 4 | 24 ± 4 | 23 ± 4 | 23 ± 5 | 0.065 | 0.089 |
LPR group | 23 ± 7 | 23 (19,28) | 24 ± 5 | 21 ± 4 | 0.252 | 0.664 |
SPO2 (%) | ||||||
HPR group | 97 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 | 98 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 | 0.211 | 0.259 |
LPR group | 97 (95,100) | 98 ± 2 | 99 (98,100) | 98 (97,100) | 0.197 | 0.171 |