Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjusted logistic regression for dichotomized GOS (favorable outcome: GOS = 4 and 5, and unfavorable outcome: GOS < 4) for core model and extended model with and without the addition of PTCI. AUC and AIC for each model are represented along with the ANOVA comparison between the model with and without the addition of PTCI. We used Nahelkerke’s Pseudo R2 for consistency with the original IMPACT study

From: Impact of a posttraumatic cerebral infarction on outcome in patients with TBI: the Italian multicenter cohort INCEPT study

 

Core model

Extended model

OR

95% C.I.

p

OR

95 C.I.

p

Age

1.03

1.01–1.06

0.002

1.01

1.01–1.07

0.002

GCSm

0.34

0.14–0.77

0.012

0.33

1.27–7.14

0.015

Pupils

2.76

1.08–7.35

0.035

1.79

0.64–5.05

0.263

PTCI

   

4.52

1.88–11.39

< 0.001

AUC

0.73 (95% C.I.: 0.66–0.82)

0.79 (95% C.I.: 0.71–0.83)

AUC comparison

Model with PTCI is better than the model without PTCI p = 0.0007

Nagelkerke’s R2

0.21

0.33

Age

1.03

1.01–1.06

0.003

1.03

1.01–1.06

0.004

GCSm

0.29

0.12–0.07

0.007

0.27

0.10–0.67

0.007

Pupils

3.11

1.14–8.90

0.027

2.09

0.68–6.48

0.190

Hypotension

2.24

0.73–7.12

0.160

3.29

0.99–11.60

0.055

Hypoxia

1.58

0.41–6.01

0.495

2.00

0.43–11.63

0.37

SAH

1.23

0.49–3.19

0.652

1.30

0.46–3.80

0.62

EDH

0.93

0.28–0.41

0.882

7.96

0.26–2.28

0.68

Marshall CT score

–

–

0.991

–

–

0.99

PTCI

   

6.84

2.58–19.7

< 0.001

AUC

0.74 (0.65–0.81)

0.82 (0.69–0.85)

Nagelkerke’s R2

0.26

0.39

AUC comparison

Model with PTCI is better than the model without PTCI p = 0.00008

  1. GCSm Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, OR proportional odds ratio, C.I. confidence interval, SAH traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, EDH epidural hematoma. Hypotension and hypoxia refer to both pre-hospital and intra-hospital periods