Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study

Table 2 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients in the failure group

Case No.	Gender	Age (yo)	Cause of ARDS	Baseline PaO₂/FiO₂ (mmHg)	SpO₂ (%)	PaO₂/FiO₂ with HFNC	PaO₂/FiO₂ with HFNC+PP	PaO₂/FiO₂ with NIV	PaO₂/FiO₂ with NIV+PP	Intubation	ECMO	Outcome
12	Male	39	Influenza	60	90		138	60		Yes	No	Survive
13	Male	64	Viral Pneumonia	83	90			83	121	Yes	Yes	Survive
14	Male	61	Influenza	59	92			59	87	Yes	No	Survive
15	Female	65	Pneumocystis Pneumonia	83	91			83	34	Yes	Yes	Survive
16	Female	56	Influenza	91	95	100		91	141	Yes	No	Survive
17	Female	53	Influenza	70	96		113	70		Yes	No	Survive
18	Male	36	Legionella pneumonia	73	96			73	95	Yes	No	Survive
19	Female	49	Pneumonia without pathogen	130	94	113	130			Yes	Yes	Death
20	Male	63	Pneumonia without pathogen	95	90	91	95			Yes	No	Survive

ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome, NIV non-invasive ventilation, HFNC high flow nasal cannula, PP prone position, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

ISSN: 1364-8535