Skip to main content

Table 3 Unit-wise admission and outcomes

From: Impact of a computerized decision support tool deployed in two intensive care units on acute kidney injury progression and guideline compliance: a prospective observational study

 

General ICU

Cardiac ICU

Control (n = 1041)

Intervention (n = 1022)

p value

Control (n = 1346)

Intervention (n = 1363)

p value

Age

61.0 (15.6)

60.2 (16.5)

0.26

65.4 (13.3)

65.3 (13.4)

0.72

ICU LOS

6.1 (8.0)

5.7 (7.4)

0.22

5.6 (5.7)

6.0 (4.6)

0.04

Hospital LOS

15.5 (18.6)

17.4 (19.2)

0.02

11.4 (9.1)

13.0 (9.8)

< 0.0001

Admission information

Medical

546 (52.4%)

572 (56.0%)

0.11

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

NA

Surgery

495 (47.6%)

450 (44.0%)

0.11

1346 (100%)

1363 (100%)

NA

Emergency/salvage

45 (4.3%)

94 (9.2%)

< 0.001

55 (4.1%)

58 (4.3%)

0.83

Urgent

110 (10.6%)

73 (7.1%)

0.006

502 (37.3%)

300 (22.0%)

< 0.001

Elective/scheduled

340 (32.7%)

283 (27.7%)

0.014

789 (58.6%)

857 (62.9%)

0.023

Outcomes

APACHE II/EuroScore (CICU control)

15.3 (7.1)

15.0 (6.6)

0.33

5.3 (2.9)

8.9 (8.2)

NA

APACHE II mortality prediction

19.6 (21.6)

19.1 (19.6)

0.58

 

4.9 (8.0)

NA

Readmissions

16 (1.5%)

21 (2.1%)

0.38

30 (2.2%)

60 (4.4%)

0.002

Died

132 (12.7%)

107 (10.5%)

0.12

29 (2.16%)

12 (0.88%)

0.007

  1. The table shows ICU and hospital stay information, admission information including type of surgery and outcomes for each unit separately. Data are presented as: for binary variables—count (percentage of admissions) and for continuous variables—mean (standard deviation). p values compare control cohort to intervention cohort for each unit. p value calculation is described in ‘Methods’ section. See ‘Results’ section for details