Skip to main content

Table 3 A 3-step approach to investigate a potential mediation role of the effect on 3HB for the outcome benefits of late-PN

From: Effect of withholding early parenteral nutrition in PICU on ketogenesis as potential mediator of its outcome benefit

Ā 

Likelihood of live weaning from mechanical ventilatory support

Likelihood of live discharge from the PICU

Acquisition of a new infection in the PICU

A. Impact of randomization (nā€‰=ā€‰1142)

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P value

ā€ƒRandomization to late-PN (nā€‰=ā€‰562) vs. early-PN (nā€‰=ā€‰580)

1.14 (1.01ā€“1.29)

0.02

1.19 (1.06ā€“1.35)

0.003

0.49 (0.34ā€“0.70)

<ā€‰0.0001

ā€ƒDemographics

ā€ƒā€ƒAge per year added

1.02 (0.98ā€“1.05)

0.18

1.02 (0.99ā€“1.06)

0.11

1.02 (0.93ā€“1.13)

0.59

ā€ƒā€ƒWeight per kg added

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.65

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.34

0.99 (0.96ā€“1.02)

0.72

ā€ƒā€ƒMale gender

0.98 (0.85ā€“1.11)

0.85

0.94 (0.83ā€“1.07)

0.39

1.11 (0.78ā€“1.58)

0.52

ā€ƒCharacteristics of type and severity of illness

ā€ƒā€ƒEmergency vs. planned admission

0.74 (0.61ā€“0.90)

0.003

0.77 (0.63ā€“0.93)

0.008

1.74 (1.03ā€“2.92)

0.03

ā€ƒā€ƒDiagnostic group

Ā 

0.22

Ā 

0.40

Ā 

0.06

ā€ƒā€ƒPIM2 score per point added

0.70 (0.66ā€“0.74)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.72 (0.68ā€“0.76)

<ā€‰0.0001

1.41 (1.25ā€“1.60)

<ā€‰0.0001

ā€ƒā€ƒHigh vs. medium risk of malnutrition (STRONGkids risk level 4ā€“5 vs. 1ā€“3)

0.86 (0.68ā€“1.06)

0.17

0.83 (0.67ā€“1.03)

0.1

1.15 (0.65ā€“2.02)

0.62

ā€ƒā€ƒPresence of infection on admission

0.72 (0.61ā€“0.84)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.71 (0.61ā€“0.84)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.52 (0.32ā€“0.83)

0.005

ā€ƒā€ƒNeed for hemodynamic assist device on admission

0.51 (0.34ā€“0.76)

0.001

0.48 (0.32ā€“0.73)

0.0005

1.71 (0.80ā€“3.64)

0.16

B. Mediation role for plasma 3HB (nā€‰=ā€‰1142)

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P value

ā€ƒPlasma 3HB on day 2 (per mmol/l)1

1.12 (1.05ā€“1.20)

0.0002

1.10 (1.03ā€“1.17)

0.004

0.85 (0.68ā€“1.06)

0.14

ā€ƒRandomization to late-PN (nā€‰=ā€‰562) vs. early-PN (nā€‰=ā€‰580)

1.01 (0.88ā€“1.16)

0.79

1.08 (0.94ā€“1.24)

0.26

0.56 (0.38ā€“0.84)

0.004

ā€ƒDemographics

ā€ƒā€ƒAge per year added

1.02 (0.99ā€“1.06)

0.11

1.03 (0.99ā€“1.06)

0.06

1.02 (0.92ā€“1.12)

0.64

ā€ƒā€ƒWeight per kg added

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.55

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.28

0.99 (0.96ā€“1.02)

0.72

ā€ƒā€ƒMale gender

0.99 (0.88ā€“1.12)

0.95

0.95 (0.84ā€“1.07)

0.44

1.11 (0.78ā€“1.57)

0.55

ā€ƒCharacteristics of type and severity of illness

ā€ƒā€ƒEmergency vs. planned admission

0.77 (0.63ā€“0.94)

0.01

0.79 (0.65ā€“0.96)

0.02

1.65 (0.98ā€“2.79)

0.05

ā€ƒā€ƒDiagnostic group

Ā 

0.27

Ā 

0.32

Ā 

0.07

ā€ƒPIM2 score per point added

0.70 (0.66ā€“0.74)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.72 (0.68ā€“0.76)

<ā€‰0.0001

1.41 (1.24ā€“1.60)

<ā€‰0.0001

ā€ƒā€ƒHigh vs. medium risk of malnutrition

0.85 (0.68ā€“1.05)

0.14

0.83 (0.67ā€“1.03)

0.09

1.16 (0.66ā€“2.05)

0.59

ā€ƒā€ƒPresence of infection on admission

0.72 (0.61ā€“0.85)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.72 (0.61ā€“0.84)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.51 (0.32ā€“0.82)

0.004

ā€ƒā€ƒNeed for hemodynamic assist device on admission

0.50 (0.33ā€“0.76)

0.001

0.48 (0.32ā€“0.73)

0.0001

1.66 (0.78ā€“3.55)

0.19

C. Sensitivity analysis (direct/indirect 3HB effect) (nā€‰=ā€‰1142)

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Risk ratio (95% CI)

P value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

P value

ā€ƒPlasma 3HB on day 2 (per mmol/l)1

1.12 (1.05ā€“1.19)

0.0005

1.09 (1.02ā€“1.17)

0.007

0.80 (0.63ā€“1.02)

0.06

ā€ƒRandomization to late-PN (nĀ =ā€‰562) vs. early-PN (nā€‰=ā€‰580)

0.97 (0.83ā€“1.12)

0.70

1.04 (0.89ā€“1.21)

0.60

0.62 (0.40ā€“0.94)

0.02

ā€ƒDemographics

ā€ƒā€ƒAge per year added

1.03 (0.99ā€“1.06)

0.08

1.03 (0.99ā€“1.06)

0.06

1.03 (0.93ā€“1.14)

0.50

ā€ƒā€ƒWeight per kg added

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.67

0.99 (0.98ā€“1.00)

0.36

0.99 (0.96ā€“1.02)

0.54

ā€ƒā€ƒMale gender

0.97 (0.86ā€“1.11)

0.74

0.94 (0.83ā€“1.06)

0.34

1.19 (0.83ā€“1.72)

0.33

ā€ƒCharacteristics of type and severity of illness

ā€ƒā€ƒEmergency vs. planned admission

0.72 (0.59ā€“0.89)

0.002

0.76 (0.62ā€“0.93)

0.01

1.62 (0.94ā€“2.79)

0.07

ā€ƒā€ƒDiagnostic group

Ā 

0.28

Ā 

0.42

Ā 

0.03

ā€ƒā€ƒPIM2 score per point added

0.69 (0.65ā€“0.73)

<ā€‰0.0001

0.72 (0.68ā€“0.75)

<ā€‰0.0001

1.45 (1.27ā€“1.65)

<ā€‰0.0001

ā€ƒā€ƒHigh vs. medium risk of malnutrition

0.84 (0.67ā€“1.04)

0.12

0.82 (0.65ā€“1.02)

0.07

1.15 (0.64ā€“2.06)

0.63

ā€ƒā€ƒPresence of infection on admission

0.72 (0.61ā€“0.85)

0.0001

0.72 (0.62ā€“0.85)

0.0001

0.49 (0.30ā€“0.81)

0.004

ā€ƒā€ƒNeed for hemodynamic assist device on admission

0.51 (0.34ā€“0.78)

0.002

0.48 (0.32ā€“0.74)

0.0008

1.44 (0.66ā€“3.13)

0.36

ā€ƒLate-PN-affected regulators of ketogenesis

ā€ƒā€ƒPlasma insulin at time of 3HB assessment (per Ī¼IU/l)

1.00 (0.99ā€“1.00)

0.93

0.99 (0.99ā€“1.00)

0.52

0.80 (0.63ā€“1.02)

0.76

ā€ƒā€ƒBlood glucose at time of 3HB assessment (per mg/dl)

0.99 (0.99ā€“0.99)

0.02

0.99 (0.99ā€“1.00)

0.46

0.99 (0.99ā€“1.00)

0.49

  1. 1Plasma 3HB was quantified for all study patients with an available plasma sample on day 2 (nā€‰=ā€‰822) or day 1 (nā€‰=ā€‰320) for patients with a shorter PICU stay