Hemodynamic response during endotracheal suctioning predicts awakening and functional outcome in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients

Table 3 Hemodynamic response during endotracheal suctioning

Variable	HR change [bpm]	p value	MAP change [mmHg]	p value
H&H grades 1–3	3.3 (± 6.9)	< 0.001	3.0 (± 7.8)	0.435
H&H grades 4–5	1.5 (± 7.2)	< 0.001	3.3 (± 7.9)	0.435
No ICH on admission	2.1 (± 6.8)	0.192	2.9 (± 7.6)	0.162
ICH on admission	2.7 (± 8.0)	0.192	3.7 (± 8.2)	0.162
Low-grade SEBES (0–2)	2.5 (± 7.2)	0.092	3.5 (± 7.8)	0.025
High-grade SEBES (3–4)	1.8 (± 7.2)	0.092	2.4 (± 7.8)	0.025
Low-grade mFisher (1–2)	2.9 (± 6.4)	0.196	2.4 (± 6.3)	0.101
High-grade mFisher (3–4)	2.2 (± 7.3)	0.196	3.3 (± 8.1)	0.101
Controlled ventilation mode	1.1 (± 6.0)	< 0.001	2.6 (± 7.3)	0.004
Assisted ventilation mode	5.3 (± 8.8)	< 0.001	4.4 (± 8.9)	0.004

Data are given in mean (± standard deviation)
All models were calculated with univariate GEE models
Bpm beats per minute, H&H Hunt and Hess, ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, SEBES Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Early Brain Edema Score, mFisher modified Fisher score

ISSN: 1364-8535