Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population according to targeted temperature management

From: Temporal trends in the use of targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest and association with outcome: insights from the Paris Sudden Death Expertise Centre

 

No TTM (n = 1793)

TTM (n = 1847)

P

Male, n %

1169 (65%)

1318 (71%)

< 0.001

Age, ±SD

64 ± 16

61 ± 15

< 0.001

Home location, n %

1186 (66%)

1017 (55%)

< 0.001

Witness, n %

1569 (87%)

1697 (92%)

< 0.001

Bystander CPR, n %

1142 (63%)

1195 (65%)

< 0.001

Shockable rhythm, n %

592 (33%)

1065 (58%)

< 0.001

No-flow duration > 3 min*, n %

666 (37%)

881 (48%)

< 0.001

Low-flow duration > 20 min*, n %

588 (33%)

760 (42%)

< 0.001

Epinephrine use, n %

1259 (70%)

1224 (66%)

< 0.001

First arterial pH, ±SD

7.13 ± 0.22

7.22 ± 0.15

< 0.001

Post-resuscitation shock, n %

863 (48%)

1253 (68%)

< 0.001

Early invasive coronary strategy, n %

767 (43%)

1494 (80%)

< 0.001

Survival at ICU discharge, n %

370 (20%)

689 (37%)

< 0.001

Good neurological prognosis at ICU discharge, n %

273 (15%)

618 (33%)

< 0.001

  1. Values are expressed with proportion (%), mean with standard deviation (SD)
  2. CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  3. *Characteristics were dichotomized according to the median value