No.
|
Authors/year
|
Thresholda (%)
|
TP
|
FP
|
FN
|
TN
|
Sens (%)
|
Spec (%)
|
AUROC
|
Responders (%)
|
---|
1
|
Durand 2008
|
12
|
15
|
1
|
3
|
7
|
81.2
|
85.7
|
0.85
|
69.23
|
2
|
Choi 2010
|
20
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
9
|
91
|
90
|
0.83
|
52.38
|
3
|
Renner 2011
|
7
|
13
|
2
|
0
|
12
|
100
|
85
|
0.92
|
48.15
|
4
|
Pereira 2011
|
10
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
100
|
100
|
1.0
|
56.67
|
5
|
Byon 2013
|
11
|
13
|
5
|
2
|
13
|
86.7
|
72.2
|
0.804
|
45.45
|
6
|
Lee 2014
|
14
|
12
|
2
|
1
|
11
|
92.0
|
85.0
|
0.956
|
50.00
|
7
|
Lee 2015
|
13.5
|
9
|
3
|
4
|
13
|
69.2
|
78.6
|
0.77
|
44.83
|
8
|
Krishna 2016
|
12.2
|
24
|
1
|
0
|
17
|
100
|
94
|
0.975
|
57.14
|
9
|
Favia 2017
|
16.5
|
6
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
83.0
|
55.0
|
0.70
|
43.75
|
10
|
Lee 2017
|
12
|
10
|
2
|
7
|
11
|
58.8
|
84.6
|
0.765
|
56.67
|
11
|
Morparia 2018
|
12.3
|
10
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
77
|
89
|
0.90
|
59.09
|
- TP true positive, FP false positive, FN false negative, TN true negative, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, AUROC area under the receive operator characteristic curve, Thresholda threshold used in studies to achieve corresponding sensitivity and specialty, 95%CI 95% confidence interval