Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of both trials

From: Pre-hospital plasma transfusion: a valuable coagulation support or an expensive fluid therapy?

 

COMBAT

PAMPer

 

FFP

Standard

FFP

Standard

Setting

US ground EMS transport (Denver) single-centre

US air EMS transport multicentre

Randomisation

Individual randomisation by content of cooling boxes; staff non-blinded

Cluster randomisation at monthly intervals; staff non-blinded

Inclusion criteria

BP < 70 mmHg or BP 71–90 mmHg + HR > 108/min

BP < 70 mmHg or BP < 90 mmHg and HR > 108/min

Patients included (n)

65 vs 60

230 vs 271

Age median (IQR)

33 (25–51)

33 (25–42)

44 (31–59)

46 (28–60)

Male (%)

80

85

71

74

Blunt injury (%)

46

53

81

73

Injury severity Score median (IQR)*

27 (10–41)

27 (11–36)

22 (14–33)

21 (12–29)

Prothrombin time ratio or INR on hospital arrival

1.3

1.2

1.2

1.3

Pre-hospital management

 Pre-hospital intubation (%)

Not provided

Not provided

50

50

 Pre-hospital RBCs (%)

Not provided

Not provided

26

42

 Pre-hospital crystalloids (mls) median (IQR)

150 (0–300)

250 (100–500)

500 (0–1250)

900 (0–1500)

 Tranexamic acid within 6 h (%)

9

13

Not provided

Not provided

 Intervention

2 U pre-thawed FFP up to 5d old FFP vs standard

2 U apheresis FFP (approx. 500 ml) vs standard

 Median Transportation time median (IQR)

28 (22–34) min

24 (19–31) min

42 (34–53) min

40 (33–41) min

Outcome

 Primary endpoint

Mortality 28 days

Mortality 30 days

 Mortality 28/30d (%)

15

10

23

33

 Mortality 24 h (%)

12

10

14

22

  1. *Combat trial New Injury Severity Score was used