Skip to main content

Table 1 Classification of videolaryngoscopes available in ICU and respective advantages and inconveniences

From: Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients

Videolaryngoscopes (VLs)

Advantages

Inconveniences

VL without channel (example: Glidescope (Verathon), Mc Grath serie 5 (Medtronic/Covidien), C-mac D-blade (Karl Storz), Kingvision non channelled (Ambu) etc.)

- Angulated blade (improve glottis view of + 2 Cormack)

- Use of stylet mandatory to pre-shape the endotracheal tube

- Difficulty to enter the tube into the trachea through the glottis (importance of training)

VL with channel (example: Airtraq (Vygon), Airway scope (Pentax), Kingvision channelled (Ambu) etc.)

- Angulated blade with channel (improve glottis view of + 2 Cormack)

- No need of stylet (the tracheal tube is introduced in the channel)

- Size of the device in case of limited opening mouth

- Difficulty to enter the tube into the trachea through the glottis (importance of training)

Combo (or "Macintosh") VL (example: Mc Grath Mac (Medtronic/Covidien), APA (Care fusion), C-mac (Karl Storz) etc.)

- Direct and indirect laryngoscopy using the same standard Macintosh shaped-blade

- Possibility to insert an angulated blade on the same device

- With or without channel

- With deported or included screen

- Indirect laryngoscopy with a standard Macintosh blade: improve glottis of + 1 Cormack (instead of + 2 Cormack with an angulated blade)

VL with deported screen (example: Glidescope (Verathon), C-mac (Karl Storz), APA (Care fusion) etc.)

- Large screen

- Educational

- Cumbersome

VL with screen included on the device (example: C-mac pocket (Karl Storz), Mc Grath Mac (Medtronic/Covidien), APA (Care fusion), Airtraq (Vygon), Kingvision (Ambu) etc.)

- Portable

- Smaller screen

- Less educational than a deported screen

  1. One VL can belong to several categories. VLs videolaryngoscopes