Skip to main content

Table 2 Informed consent models

From: Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review

 

Model

Description

Advantages

Disadvantages

Level of control

Opt-in

Actively given, explicit consent

- Promotes autonomy

- Respects patients’ expectations and preserves trust

- Lower response rates and potential consent bias

- Relatively costly and time-consuming

Opt-out

Consent is presumed unless participant objects

- Higher participation rates and less bias than opt-in

- More practical, less costly

- Assumes that people want to participate: may infringe upon autonomy

- Potentially less informed

No consent

Study is conducted without consent (exception/waiver)

- Maximum participation rates and no consent bias

- Most practical, least costly

- No control whatsoever by data subjects: least autonomy-enhancing

Timing

Prospective

Consent is given prior to the start of data collection

- Promotes autonomy

- Respects patients’ or representatives’ expectations and preserves trust

- Time pressure and stress in emergencies: consent not fully informed/valid

- Excluding (temporarily) incapacitated subjects causes bias and may not respect subjects’ wishes

Deferred

Retrospective consent which is sought after data collection

- Provides temporarily incapacitated subjects the opportunity to participate

- More valid than prior (subject or representative) consent in stressful situations

- Logistical issues with reaching participants

- Data are already collected: less autonomy-enhancing than prior consent

Specificity

Study-specific

Consent for the use of data for one specific aim

- Promotes autonomy since patient has a high level of control over uses

- Requires re-contacting subjects for new aims: logistical challenge and burden for participants

- Bias when contact attempts are unsuccessful

Tiered

Subject chooses from a list what types of research are allowed (online: dynamic consent)

- Promotes autonomy since patient has a high level of control over uses

- Burdensome and complicated for subjects: requires detailed understanding

Broad or blanket

Consent for overall research topic (broad) or without limitation (blanket)

- Smallest burden for researchers and patients in terms of re-contacting

- Broad consent may not be truly informed

- Blanket consent often not accepted by research ethics committees