Skip to main content

Table 4 Empirical and documented therapies in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients

From: Clinical characteristics and prognosis of bacteraemia during postoperative intra-abdominal infections

Anti-infective regimens

Bacteraemic patients (n = 64)

Patients without bacteraemia (n = 279)

p value

Empirical therapy

 Combination of EAT, n (%)

49 (77)

226 (81)

0.42

 Imipenem/cilastatin, n (%)

22 (34)

69 (25)

0.12

 Piperacillin tazobactam, n (%)

36 (56)

173 (62)

0.39

 Vancomycin, n (%)

30 (47)

122 (44)

0.65

 Aminoglycosides, n (%)

31 (48)

140 (50)

0.80

 Antifungals, n (%)

21 (33)

101 (36)

0.61

 Fluconazole, n (%)

17 (27)

89 (32)

0.45

 Caspofungin, n (%)

3 (5)

8 (3)

0.43

 Adequacy of EAT, n (%)

43 (67)

190 (68)

0.89

Documented therapy

 Antibiotic treatment de-escalation, n (%)

37 (58)

163 (58)

0.93

 Antibiotic treatment escalation, n (%)

15 (23)

72 (26)

0.69

 Combination of EAT, n (%)

38 (59)

190 (68)

0.19

 Imipenem/cilastatin, n (%)

23 (36)

56 (20)

0.007

 Piperacillin tazobactam, n (%)

20 (31)

98 (35)

0.55

 Vancomycin, n (%)

16 (25)

90 (32)

0.25

 Aminoglycosides, n (%)

12 (19)

36 (13)

0.22

 Antifungals, n (%)

20 (31)

117 (42)

0.11

  Fluconazole, n (%)

16 (25)

104 (37)

0.06

  Caspofungin, n (%)

2 (3)

7 (3)

0.78

Duration of antibiotic therapy in daysa, median (IQR)

10 (8–14)

10 (8–14)

0.89

  1. EAT Empirical antibiotic therapy, IQR interquartile range
  2. aVariable measured in surviving patients