Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of patients in high-volume haemofiltration and control groups

From: Early application of continuous high-volume haemofiltration can reduce sepsis and improve the prognosis of patients with severe burns

 

Burn ≥ 50% TBSA

Burn ≥ 80% TBSA

Control (n = 41)

HVHF (n = 41)

p Value

Control (n = 21)

HVHF (n = 17)

p Value

Mortality

 28-day, n (%)

13 (31.7)

9 (22.0)

0.46

10 (47.6)

5 (29.4)

0.33

 60-day, n (%)

17 (41.5)

11 (26.8)

0.24

13 (61.9)

5 (29.4)

0.06

 90-day, n (%)

19 (46.3)

11 (26.8)

0.11

14 (66.7)

5 (29.4)a

0.049

Sepsis, n (%)

21 (51.2)

11 (26.8)a

0.04

15 (71.4)

6 (37.5)a

0.04

Septic shock, n (%)

18 (43.9)

6 (14.6)a

0.01

13 (61.9)

3 (18.6)a

0.01

Duration of MV (days)

8.5 (5.3, 11.8)

7.0 (4.0, 10.5)

0.19

9.5 (2.5, 16.3)

7.0 (2.0, 8.0)

0.09

ICU days

28.5 (20.0, 48.0)

34.5 (15.5, 55.0)

0.84

31.0 (21.5, 47.5)

49.0 (18.0, 67.0)

0.23

Duration of vasopressors (days)

4.0 (2.0, 11.0)

1.0 (1.0, 1.0)a

0.001

8.0 (2.0, 12.5)

1.5 (1.0, 2.8)a

0.04

  1. Abbreviations: TBSA Total burn surface area, MV Mechanical ventilation, ICU Intensive care unit, HVHF High-volume haemofiltration
  2. Data are presented as medians (25th and 75th quantiles) or percentages. All patients were included in outcome comparisons via the intention-to-treat principle
  3. a p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference compared with the control group