Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis

From: Value of variation index of inferior vena cava diameter in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with circulatory shock receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author/year of publication

Country

Sex (M/F)

Age in y (mean ± SD)

Cases

Tidal volume (ml/kg)

Index test

Reference standard measurement

Reference standard threshold

Reference standard device

Barbier 2004 [14]

France

15/5

63 ± 15

20

8.5

(DmaxDmin)/Dmin

CI

> 15%

TTE

Feissel 2004 [15]

United States

22/17

65 ± 15

39

8–10

(DmaxDmin)/[(Dmax + Dmin)/2]

CO

> 15%

TTE

Charbonneau 2014 [16]

France

26/18

58.5

44

8–10

(DmaxDmin)/Dmin

CI

> 15%

TTE

Theerawit 2016 [17]

Thailand

11/18

62.6 ± 15.9

29

8

(DmaxDmin)/[(Dmax + Dmin)/2]

CO

> 15%

PCA

Lu 2017 [18]

China

33/16

R: 55.7 ± 12.6

N: 55 ± 12.8

49

8–10

(DmaxDmin)/Dmin

CI

≥ 10%

TTE

Vignon 2017 [19]

France

379/161

65 ± 13

540

8

(DmaxDmin)/Dmin

SV

> 10%

TTE

  1. Abbreviations: CI Cardiac index, CO Cardiac output, Dmax and Dmin Maximum (inspiration phase) and minimum (expiration phase) diameter of inferior vena cava over a complete respiratory cycle, respectively, N Nonresponder, PCA Pulse contour analysis, R Responder, SV Stroke volume, TTE Transthoracic echocardiogram