Skip to main content

Table 2 (abstract P143). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effects of AWP and body position

From: 38th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine

Parameters Body position Expiration Inspiration 30 AWP effect/interaction of AWP and group
Qpv Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 1.19 ± 0.13 / 1.14 ± 0.24 0.75 ± 0.11 / 0.89 ± 0.19 0.000 / 0.002
Qsma Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 0.83 ± 0.25 / 0.81 ± 0.23 0.56 ± 0.16 / 0.65 ± 0.20 0.000 / 0.203
Qha Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 0.13 ± 0.07 / 0.15 ± 0.09 0.07 ± 0.03 / 0.09 ± 0.04 0.001 / 0.849
Qivc Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 2.01 ± 0.38 / 1.78 ± 0.56 1.22 ± 0.25 / 1.33 ± 0.38 0.000 / 0.414
Qca Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 0.22 ± 0.07 / 0.25 ± 0.09 0.14 ± 0.04 / 0.17 ± 0.06 0.000 / 0.362
Qpv-Qsma Supine (n=12) / Trendelenburg (n=12) 0.36 ± 0.33 / 0.31 ± 0.35 0.18 ± 0.23 / 0.23 ± 0.29 0.000 / 0.043
  1. Two pigs were excluded from each group due to incomplete inspiratory hold maneuvers. AWP significantly affected all flows. Interactions with groups were found in Qpv and Qpv-Qsma
Back to article page

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535