Skip to main content

Table 3 Hemodynamic parameters in each experimental condition

From: Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation

Variables

Baseline-1

Trendelenburg

Baseline-2

VT 8

Baseline-3

EEO

Baseline-4

VE

HR (min-1)

101 (93-115)

100 (93–113)

100 (92–117)

100 (92–114)

101 (92–115)

100 (93–113)

99 (92–115)

98 (90–110)

MAP (mm Hg)

69 (64–72)

-

67 (62–72)

-

66 (62–72)

-

67 (62–73)

78 (71–85)*

PPV (%)a

7 (5–10)

-

7 (6–8)

11 (7–16)*

8 (5–9)

-

7 (5–8)

5 (3–10)

CVP (mm Hg)

7 (5–11)

11 (9–15)*

7 (4–11)

7 (4–11)

7 (4–10)

6 (4–10)**

7 (5–11)

9 (7–13)*

CCI (L.min-1.m-2)

2.8 (2.2–3.4)

3.2 (2.5–3.5)*

2.8 (2.1–3.4)

2.7 (2.1–3.4)

2.6 (2.0–3.4)

2.8 (2.2–3.4)

2.8 (2.0–3.4)

3.1 (2.6–3.7)*

CITPTD (L.min-1.m-2)

2.75 (2.06-3.50)

-

-

-

-

-

-

3.16 (2.51–3.84)*

GEDVI (mL.m-2)

696 (587–797)

-

-

-

-

-

-

727 (606–894)*

ELWI (mL.kg-1 PBW)

14.6 (11.8–20.4)

-

-

-

-

-

-

13.8 (11.7–20.1)

GEF (%)

16 (13–18)

-

-

-

-

-

-

18 (15–22)*

  1. Data are median (1st quartile to 3rd quartile)
  2. CCI continuous cardiac index assessed by pulse contour analysis, CI TPTD cardiac index assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution, CVP central venous pressure, EEO end-expiratory occlusion, ELWI extravascular lung water index, GEDVI global end-diastolic volume index, GEF global ejection fraction, HR heart rate, MAP mean arterial pressure, PBW predicted body weight, PPV pulse pressure variation, VE volume expansion, VT tidal volume
  3. aFor patients without cardiac arrhythmia (n = 19)
  4. *p < 0.001 vs. baseline-1; **p < 0.05 vs. baseline-1
Back to article page

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535