Table 1 Comparison of predictive value of variables used to determine fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in three systematic reviews
From: Use of ‘tidal volume challenge’ to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation
Systematic review/metaanalysis | Publication year | Types of studies | Patient type | Variable | AUC (95% confidence interval) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marik et al. [7] | 2009 | 29 studies 685 patients variable tidal volume | ICU and OR patients | PPV | 0.94 (0.93–0.95) |
SPV | 0.86 (0.82–0.90) | ||||
SVV | 0.84 (0.78–0.88) | ||||
LVEDA | 0.64 (0.53–0.74) | ||||
GEDV | 0.56 (0.37–0.67) | ||||
CVP | 0.55 (0.48–0.62) | ||||
Hong et al. [9] | 2014 | 19 studies 850 patients variable tidal volume | Only ICU patients | PPV | 0.88 (0.84–0.92) |
SVV | 0.84 (0.79–0.89) | ||||
Yang and Du [10] | 2014 | 22 studies 807 patients tidal volume > 8 ml/kg | Only ICU patients | PPV | 0.94 (0.91–0.95) |