Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias within included studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

From: Stress hyperglycaemia in critically ill patients and the subsequent risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, year [reference]

Selection (maximum score 4⋆)

Comparability of cohorts (maximum score 2⋆)

Outcome (maximum score 3⋆)

Total score, risk of bias

Representativeness of the exposed cohort

Selection of non-exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study

Assessment of outcome

Duration of follow-up

Adequacy of follow-up

Gornik, 2010 [21]

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

–

7, medium risk of bias

Gornik, 2010 [22]

⋆

⋆

⋆

–

⋆

⋆

⋆

–

6, medium risk of bias

McAllister, 2014 [23]

–

⋆

⋆

⋆

–

⋆

⋆

⋆

6, medium risk of bias

Van Ackerbroeck, 2015 [24]

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

⋆

–

–

6, medium risk of bias