Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of Methodological Comparisons

From: Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE

 

The trio of EGDT trials

EGDT study

Requisite for enrollment and defined as usual care

Screening using SIRS

Fluid challenge

Lactate screening for cryptic shock

Early antibiotic administration within 6 h encouraged (ProCESS)

No previous standards. Developed from a series of studies over a decade.

Enrollment

Enrollment (8/site/year)

2- to 12-h window of enrollment in the ED

Weekdays and no weekends (ProMISe)

Exclusion rate of 43 to 67 %

Single center

1–2 h enrollment

Fluid challenge

Fluid challenge—1 liter or surrogate

20–30 mL/kg

Trial duration and timing

Trials began 7–8 years after EGDT (2008–2015)

Duration ranging between 4 and 8 years

SSC guidelines were published in 2004, 2008, and 2012

No existing sepsis protocols

Blinding

Open label study in the ICU

ICU was blinded to care provided in the ED

Trial conduct

Duration of ED stay less than 3 h

Majority of care provided in ICU

Delayed resuscitation bundle completion after 6 h not tested

High volume and tertiary care centers

CVP placement over 50 % of control groups in trio of EGDT trials

A reduction in sample size after interim analysis low mortality

Performed in ED only

6–8 h in the ED

Delayed care improves outcomes

Co-morbidities

Fewer

Younger patients

Increased cardiovascular, liver, neurologic and renal failure

Mechanical ventilation

Rate of 26 %

No delayed increase after enrollment

Protective lung strategies

Rate of 54 %

No protective lung or fluid management strategies

Increase in delayed MV in the control group.

Illness severity

Acute pulmonary edema excluded

Acute lung injury excluded

Lower temperature

Lower PaCO2

More tachypnea

Hemodynamic phenotype

Normal ScvO2 and CVP at baseline (all groups received similar fluids as the original EGDT treatment group from hospital arrival to 6 hours)

50 % more vasopressors (vasodilatory) in the trio of EGDT trials

Steroid use 8–37 %

Lower ScvO2

Higher lactate

Lower CVP

No steroid use

Sudden cardiopulmonary events

Not a predominant feature

Significant reduction from 20 to 10 %

Sources of improved care

Pre-existing sepsis protocols, pre-hospital care, sepsis alerts and screens, rapid response systems, telemedicine, glucose control, ventilator strategies, hemoglobin strategies, palliative care, national limits on ED length of stay (Australia and United Kingdom), ultrasound

 

Generalizability and external validity

Performed in academic centers in industrialized countries

Specialized care delivery

EGDT replicated in community and academic centers worldwide

  1. CVP central venous pressure, EGDT Early Goal-Directed Therapy, ED emergency department, ICU intensive care unit, MV mechanical ventilation, PaCO 2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide, ProCESS Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock, ProMISe Protocolized Management in Sepsis, ScvO 2 central venous oxygen saturation, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, SSC Surviving Sepsis Campaign