Skip to main content

Table 3 Assessment of the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for microbiologically documented infections

From: Strategies of initiation and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in 41 French intensive care units

Parameter

Appropriate AT

Inappropriate AT

P

 

(n = 203)

(n = 58)

 

AT protocol available in the ICU

79 (61.1%)

35 (60.3%)

0.91

Timing of new AT prescription

   

   Day shifts

97 (47.8%)

30 (51.7%)

0.59

   Out-of-hours

106 (52.2%)

28 (48.3%)

 

Category of MD prescriber

   

   Fellow

17 (8,4%)

7 (12.1%)

0.88

   Senior physician

148 (72.9%)

41 (70.7%)

 

   Medical team decision

38 (18.7%)

10 (17.2%)

 

Time of initiation of new AT

   

   Suspicion of infection

120 (59.1%)

29 (50.0%)

 

   Gram-stained direct examination available

65 (32.0%)

12 (20.7%)

<0.0001

   Microbiologic identification available

18 (8.9%)

3 (5.2%)

 

   Susceptibility testing available

0

14 (24.4%)

 

Change of AT

   

   None

107 (52.7%)

14 (24.1%)

 

   Gram-stained direct examination available

11 (5.4%)

4 (6.9%)

0.001

   Microbiologic identification available

32 (15.8%)

11 (19.0%)

 

   Susceptibility testing available

53 (26.1%)

29 (50.0%)

 

Number of AT changes

0.5 ± 0.6

0.9 ± 0.7

0.05

Non-microbiologic reason for AT change

38 (18.7%)

10 (17.2%)

0.79

   Clinical worsening

4 (2.0%)

1 (1.7%)

 

   New site of infection

5 (2.5%)

4 (6.9%)

 

   Aminoglycoside stopped

23 (11.3%)

4 (6.9%)

 

   AB side effect

3 (1.5%)

1 (1.7%)

 

   De-escalation

26 (12.8%)

4 (6.9%)

 
  1. Data are presented among the patients receiving new AT (n = 509), and expressed as mean ± SD or as number (proportion). AT, antibiotic therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; MD, medical doctor.