Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Biochemical and hematological parameters (including thromboelastography) differ in patients with sepsis and SIRS after esophagectomy

Introduction

Early diagnosis of sepsis and its differentiation from non-infective SIRS is very important. The links between inflammation and coagulation play an important role in the SIRS/sepsis process. We investigated hematological and biochemical parameters (including thromboelastography (TEG)) in patients after surgical resection of esophagus. The aim of our project was to find out whether there are any changes in these parameters that could help in differentiation between SIRS and sepsis.

Methods

In our study we enrolled 38 patients (aged 41 to 74) undergoing esophagectomy. Blood samples were obtained in the morning before the operation and then every 24 hours for the next 6 postoperative days (POD). Blood samples were analysed for the following parameters: procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, aspartate transaminase (AST), lactate, white blood count (WBC), D-dimers, antithrombin (AT), international normalised ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and parameters of TEG.

Results

Nine patients developed sepsis within 6 postoperative days. Five of them had pneumonia and in four patients the cause of sepsis was dehiscention of gastroesophageal anasthosmosis. Significant differences between patients with SIRS and patients with sepsis were found in the following parameters: 0-day (before operation): no significant differences; POD 1: differences in AST (P < 0.002) only; POD 2: AST (P < 0.003), lactate (P < 0.006), D-dimers (P < 0.02), PCT (P = 0.03), IL-6 (P < 0.03), WBC (P < 0.03); POD 3: AST (P < 0.03), PCT (P < 0.02), IL-6 (P = 0.006), CRP (P < 0.04), WBC (P < 0.05); POD 4: AST (P = 0.006), PCT (P = 0.007), IL-6 (P < 0.02), CRP (P = 0.03), D-dimers (P < 0.05), INR (P = 0.03); POD 5: PCT (P < 0.003), IL-6 (P < 0.04), CRP (P < 0.04), AT (P = 0.03); and POD 6: PCT (P = 0.0001), CRP (P < 0.013), WBC (P = 0.03), TEG-LY30 (P < 0.04).

Conclusions

Sequential measurement of biochemical and hemato-logical parameters, mainly AST, PCT, IL-6, WBC, CRP and D-dimers, can help in early diagnosis of sepsis in patients after extensive operation such as esophagectomy. On the contrary, TEG does not seem to be helpful in differentiation of SIRS/sepsis during the early postoperative period. However, it seems to be useful after the fifth postoperative day.

Acknowledgements

Supported by grant agency of Charles University No. 21509.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durila, M., Bronský, J., Haruštiak, T. et al. Biochemical and hematological parameters (including thromboelastography) differ in patients with sepsis and SIRS after esophagectomy. Crit Care 15 (Suppl 1), P443 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9863

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9863

Keywords