From: Multidisciplinary care for tracheostomy patients: a systematic review
Description of the study |
---|
   1. Patient/population |
   2. Number |
   3. Setting |
   4. Intervention |
   5. Comparison/control |
   6. Outcomes |
   7. Inclusion criteria |
   8. Exclusion criteria |
Study validity |
   1. Were there any conflicts of interest in the writing or funding of this study? |
   2. Does the study have a clearly focused question? |
   3. Is a cohort study the appropriate method to answer this question? |
   4. Does the study have specified inclusion/exclusion criteria? |
   5. If there were specified inclusion/exclusion criteria, were these appropriate? |
   6. Other than the exposure under investigation, were the groups selected from similar populations? |
   7. Aside from the exposure, were the groups treated the same? |
   8. Was exposure measured in a standard, valid and reliable way? |
   9. Were outcome assessors blind to the exposure? |
   10. Were all outcomes measured in a standard, valid and reliable way? |
   11. Were outcomes assessed objectively and independently? |
   12. Is the paper free of selective outcome reporting? |
   13. Were the outcomes measured appropriate? |
   14. Was there sufficient duration of follow up? |
   15. Was the study sufficiently powered to detect any differences between the groups? |
   16. If statistical analysis was undertaken, was this appropriate? |
   17. Were the groups similar at baseline with regards to key prognostic variables? |
   18. What percentage of the individuals recruited into each arm of the study were lost to follow up? |
   19. What percentages of the individuals were not included in the analysis? |
Other |
   1. What is the overall risk of bias? |
Results |
Authors' conclusions |
Our comments |