From: Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review
Max SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp. | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pettilä et al (2002) [17], 5 days | 0.792 |  |  | LODS | 0.827 |  | H |
 |  |  |  | MODS | 0.795 |  | H |
Junger et al (2002) [18], ICU stay | 0.922 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Bota et al (2002) [16], 24 hrs period | 0.898 | Â | Â | MODS | 0.9 | Â | U |
Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay | 0.9 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Total Max SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
Ho et al (2007) [11], ICU stay | 0.829 | 0.1 | C = 7.4 p = 0.496 | Â | Â | Â | H |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay | 0.7 | Â | U = 9.2 p = 0.33 | MODS | 0.65 | 8.07 p = 0.43 | H |
Pettilä et al (2002) [17], ICU stay | 0.816 |  |  | LODS | 0.839 |  | H |
 |  |  |  | MODS | 0.817 |  | H |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay | 0.69 | Â | U = 7.30 p = 0.50 | MODS | 0.64 | 9.09 p = 0.33 | I |
Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral et al (2005) [7], ICU stay | 0.84 | Â | H: p = 0.95 C: p = 0.54 | Â | Â | Â | I |
Junger et al (2002) [18], ICU stay | 0.921 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Moreno et al (1999) [21], ICU stay | 0.847 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Janssens et al (2000) [20], ICU stay | 0.86 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | H |
Delta SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
Ho et al (2007) [11], TMS – Adm | 0.635 | 0.12 | C = 20.2 p = 0.001 |  |  |  | H |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], TMS – Adm | 0.54 |  | U = 53.48 p < 0.01 | MODS | 0.55 | 31.2 p < 0.01 | H |
Pettilä et al (2002) [17], day 5 – Adm | 0.6 |  |  | LODS | 0.633 |  | H |
 |  |  |  | MODS | 0.653 |  | H |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], TMS – Adm | 0.51 |  | U = 98.01 p < 0.01 | MODS | 0.52 | 70.52 p < 0.01 | I |
Junger et al (2002) [18], TMS – Adm | 0.828 |  |  |  |  |  | I |
Moreno et al (1999) [21], TMS – Adm | 0.742 |  |  |  |  |  | I |
Ferreira et al (2001) [19], 48 hrs – Adm | 0.69 |  |  |  |  |  | I |
Ferreira et al (2001) [19], 96 hrs – Adm | 0.62 |  |  |  |  |  | I |
Janssens et al (2000) [20], TMS – Adm | 0.62 |  |  |  |  |  | H |
Mean SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay | 0.77 | Â | U = 22.66 p < 0.01 | MODS | 0.74 | 46.13 p < 0.01 | H |
Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay | 0.79 | Â | U = 28.92 p < 0.01 | MODS | 0.75 | 42.72 p < 0.01 | I |
Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay | 0.88 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Total SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay | 0.85 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |
Modified SOFA | AUC | Brier | H/C-statistics | Comp | AUC | H/C-statistics | Mort. |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], Adm | 0.729 | Â | U = 11 p = 0.2 | LODS | 0.733 | 11.3 p = 0.19 | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 2 | 0.752 | Â | U = 8.3 p = 0.4 | LODS | 0.748 | Â | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 3 | 0.773 | Â | U = 11.3 p = 0.19 | LODS | 0.761 | Â | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 4 | 0.779 | Â | U = 7.3 p = 0.5 | LODS | 0.76 | Â | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 5 | 0.763 | Â | U = 14.4 p = 0.07 | LODS | 0.749 | Â | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 6 | 0.784 | Â | U = 11 p = 0.17 | LODS | 0.79 | Â | H |
Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 7 | 0.768 | Â | U = 6.3 p = 0.62 | LODS | 0.746 | Â | H |
Junger et al (2002) [18], Adm | 0.799 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | I |