Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance for sequential SOFA.

From: Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review

Max SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp.

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Pettilä et al (2002) [17], 5 days

0.792

  

LODS

0.827

 

H

    

MODS

0.795

 

H

Junger et al (2002) [18], ICU stay

0.922

     

I

Bota et al (2002) [16], 24 hrs period

0.898

  

MODS

0.9

 

U

Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay

0.9

     

I

Total Max SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Ho et al (2007) [11], ICU stay

0.829

0.1

C = 7.4 p = 0.496

   

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay

0.7

 

U = 9.2 p = 0.33

MODS

0.65

8.07 p = 0.43

H

Pettilä et al (2002) [17], ICU stay

0.816

  

LODS

0.839

 

H

    

MODS

0.817

 

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay

0.69

 

U = 7.30 p = 0.50

MODS

0.64

9.09 p = 0.33

I

Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral et al (2005) [7], ICU stay

0.84

 

H: p = 0.95 C: p = 0.54

   

I

Junger et al (2002) [18], ICU stay

0.921

     

I

Moreno et al (1999) [21], ICU stay

0.847

     

I

Janssens et al (2000) [20], ICU stay

0.86

     

H

Delta SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Ho et al (2007) [11], TMS – Adm

0.635

0.12

C = 20.2 p = 0.001

   

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14], TMS – Adm

0.54

 

U = 53.48 p < 0.01

MODS

0.55

31.2 p < 0.01

H

Pettilä et al (2002) [17], day 5 – Adm

0.6

  

LODS

0.633

 

H

    

MODS

0.653

 

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14], TMS – Adm

0.51

 

U = 98.01 p < 0.01

MODS

0.52

70.52 p < 0.01

I

Junger et al (2002) [18], TMS – Adm

0.828

     

I

Moreno et al (1999) [21], TMS – Adm

0.742

     

I

Ferreira et al (2001) [19], 48 hrs – Adm

0.69

     

I

Ferreira et al (2001) [19], 96 hrs – Adm

0.62

     

I

Janssens et al (2000) [20], TMS – Adm

0.62

     

H

Mean SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay

0.77

 

U = 22.66 p < 0.01

MODS

0.74

46.13 p < 0.01

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14], ICU stay

0.79

 

U = 28.92 p < 0.01

MODS

0.75

42.72 p < 0.01

I

Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay

0.88

     

I

Total SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Ferreira et al (2001) [19], ICU stay

0.85

     

I

Modified SOFA

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Comp

AUC

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Timsit et al (2002) [15], Adm

0.729

 

U = 11 p = 0.2

LODS

0.733

11.3 p = 0.19

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 2

0.752

 

U = 8.3 p = 0.4

LODS

0.748

 

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 3

0.773

 

U = 11.3 p = 0.19

LODS

0.761

 

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 4

0.779

 

U = 7.3 p = 0.5

LODS

0.76

 

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 5

0.763

 

U = 14.4 p = 0.07

LODS

0.749

 

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 6

0.784

 

U = 11 p = 0.17

LODS

0.79

 

H

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 7

0.768

 

U = 6.3 p = 0.62

LODS

0.746

 

H

Junger et al (2002) [18], Adm

0.799

     

I

  1. Adm = admission, AUC = Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, Comp. = Compared with, H = Hospital, H/C = H- or C- Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, hrs = hours, I = ICU = Intensive care unit, LODS = Logistic Organ Dysfunction System, max = maximum, MODS = Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score, Mort. = Mortality, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, TMS = total max SOFA (always measured over entire ICU stay), U = Unspecified (mortality type or H/C statistic).