Table 3 Performance at admission or a fixed time thereafter.

Ho et al (2007) [11]

0.791

0.1

C = 7.97

APACHE II

0.858

0.09

H

p = 0.437

APS

0.829

0.09

C = 2.9 p = 0.890

H

RPHICU

0.822

0.09

C = 4.7 p = 0.198

H

Holtfreter et al (2006) [12]

0.72

APACHE II

0.785

H

Zygun et al (2005) [14]

0.67

U = 8.8

MODS

0.62

H/C = 10.28

H

p = 0.38

p = 0.17

Timsit et al (2002) [15]

0.72

U = 4.55

LODS

0.726

H/C = 10.4

H

p = 0.8

p = 0.16

Pettilä et al (2002) [17]

0.776

APACHE III

0.825

H

LODS

0.805

H

MODS

0.695

H

Khwannimit (2007) [10]

0.8786

LODS

0.8802

H

MODS

0.8606

Gosling et al (2006) [13]

0.61

APACHE II

0.62

I

Zygun et al (2005) [14]

0.67

U = 11.66

MODS

0.63

H/C = 14.29

I

p = 0.17

p = 0.05

Moreno et al (1999) [21]

0.772

I

Bota et al (2002) [16]

0.872

APACHE II

0.88

U

MODS

0.856

U

Ferreira et al (2001) [19]

0.79

I

Janssens et al (2000) [20]

0.82

SAPS II

0.77

H

Other scoring moments

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Compared to

AUC

Brier

H/C-statistics

Mort.

Bota et al (2002) [16] 48 hours

0.844

MODS

0.834

U

Ferreira et al (2001) [19] 48 hours

0.78

I

Bota et al (2002) [16] 96 hours

0.847

MODS

0.861

U

Ferreira et al (2001) [19] 96 hours

0.82

I

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 2

0.742

U = 11.1

LODS

0.742

H

p = 0.2

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 3

0.762

U = 9.94

LODS

0.762

H

p = 0.27

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 4

0.766

U = 10.5

LODS

0.766

H

p = 0.23

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 5

0.746

U = 13.6

LODS

0.746

H

p = 0.09

Pettilä et al (2002) [17], day 5

0.727

LODS

0.76

H

H

MODS

0.744

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 6

0.763

U = 12.2

LODS

0.763

H

p = 0.14

Timsit et al (2002) [15], day 7

0.746

LODS

0.764

H

Bota et al (2002) [16], final

0.897

MODS

0.869

H