Figure 3
From: Circulating plasma factors induce tubular and glomerular alterations in septic burns patients
Pro-apoptotic effect of burns septic acute renal failure (ARF) group plasma on tubular cells and correlation with proteinuria. (a) Plasma from burns septic ARF group patients induced a dose-dependent decrease of tubular cell viability (XTT-based assay, n = 19, *p < 0.05 burns septic ARF group plasma 2.5%, 5% or 10% vs control healthy plasma). (b) Burns septic ARF group plasma (5%, 48 h of incubation, n = 19) induced a significant increase in tubular apoptosis (terminal uridine deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, *p < 0.05 burns septic ARF group plasma vs control healthy plasma, healthy plasma + gentamicin, healthy plasma + vancomycin or uremic plasma). Gentamicin (2 μg/ml) or vancomycin (10 μg/ml) was added to control healthy plasma in selected experiments (n = 10). A significant increase of tubular apoptosis with a maximal effect with burns septic ARF group plasma (*p < 0.05 septic, septic ARF or burns septic vs all controls) was observed. LPS (30 ng/ml) was used as positive experimental control. (b) inset, typical DNA fragmentation of apoptotic tubular cells (burns septic ARF group plasma in lanes 1–4, positive control 30 ng/ml LPS in lane 6, negative control healthy plasma in lane 5). (c) Correlation between the percentage of tubular apoptosis induced by burns septic ARF group plasma (TUNEL assay) and Pto/Cro of the enrolled patients (n = 19). (d) Significant reduction of tubular apoptosis (TUNEL assay) after addition of 5 μg/ml polymyxin B (#p < 0.05 burns septic ARF group + polymyxin vs burns septic ARF group, n = 19). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 30 ng/ml) was used as internal control. Polymyxin B pre-treatment did not completely suppress plasma-induced apoptosis (* p < 0.05 burns septic ARF group + polymyxin vs control healthy plasma). Burns septic ARF group plasma but not control healthy plasma enhanced LPS-induced tubular apoptosis (§p < 0.05 burns septic ARF group plasma + LPS vs control healthy plasma + LPS). Values in (a), (b) and (d) are expressed as averages ± standard error (SE). Each plasma was tested in triplicate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Newman-Keuls multi-comparison test was performed. Linear regression analysis was performed in (c).