Skip to main content

Table 3 Responses regarding whether to continue ventilator treatment

From: Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a comparative study of the ethical reasoning of physicians and the general public

Argument

Doctors/public

Percentage (CI)

Priority (%)

Ventilator treatment should be continued because discontinuing it might be perceived as a form of euthanasia

Doctors

General public

6.3 (3.5–9.1)

28.3 (24.3–32.3)

5.5%

14.9%

A son is strongly against discontinuing ventilator treatment, thus treatment should be continued

Doctors

General public

10.1 (6.6–13.6)

35.2 (31.0–39.4)

0.4%

7.4%

The treatment should be discontinued because it only prolongs the death process

Doctors

General public

91.9 (88.9–94.9)

81.5 (78.1–84.9)

73%

42.5%

The treatment should be discontinued because it is in accordance with the wishes of the patient

Doctors

General public

83.9 (79.6–88.2)

76.2 (72.4–80.0)

21.1%

35.2%

  1. This table shows the response pattern of the doctors and members of the general public who answered the question regarding whether to continue ventilator treatment in a terminally ill patient after unsuccessful neurosurgical treatment. The results are presented as proportions of those who agreed 'mostly' or 'entirely', with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The percentages of those who considered the argument to be the most important are also presented.