Figure 2From: Efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema – a systematic review and meta-analysisResults and pooled analysis of absolute risk differences (RDs) for the outcomes (a) need for endotracheal intubation, (b) mortality and (c) acute myocardial infarction in trials comparing continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (CPAP) versus medical therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema patients.Back to article page