Skip to main content

Table 5 Exposure to study opioids and propofol during the maintenance phase (intent to treat population)

From: Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713]

Maintenance phase

Remifentanil (n = 77)

Fentanyl (n = 75)

Median duration of study opioid infusion (hours; range)

13.7 (2.7–73.0)

14.2 (0.3–73.3)

Weighted mean study opioid infusion rate (μg/kg per hour; range)

9.4 (2.3–22.8)

1.8 (0.5–6.0)

Number of patients receiving the study drug infusion for >24 hours

11 (14%)

10 (13%)

Number of patients who received a propofol infusion

27 (35%)

30 (40%)

Mean time from starting the opioid infusion to starting the propofol infusion (hours; range)

6.6 (0.2–55.6)

5.9 (0.2–38.6)

Median duration of propofol infusion (hours; range)

9.4 (0.6–53.3)

12.0 (2.5–72.3)

Mean % of time patients received a propofol infusion (range) during the maintenance phase

62.8 (3.8–98.9)

76.1 (26.9–99.0)

Median total propofol dose (mg; range)

378.4 (15.8–4690.8)

683.0 (30.0–11323.3)

Weighted mean infusion rate of propofol (mg/kg per hour; range)

0.7 (0.1–2.7)

0.8 (0.2–2.5)

Number of patients receiving the following numbers of propofol bolus doses

(n = 27)

(n = 30)

   0

18 (67%)

14 (47%)

   1–3

8 (30%)

11 (37%)

   4–6

1 (4%)

4 (13%)

   ≥ 7

0

1 (3%)

Number of patients receiving the following numbers of propofol rate increases

(n = 27)

(n = 30)

   0

17 (63%)

6 (20%)

   1–3

5 (19%)

14 (47%)

   4–6

3 (11%)

5 (17%)

   ≥ 7

2 (7%)

5 (17%)

Number (%) of patients receiving the following numbers of propofol rate decreases

(n = 27)

(n = 30)

   0

16 (59%)

18 (60%)

   1–3

9 (33%)

8 (27%)

   4–6

2 (7%)

3 (10%)

   ≥ 7

0 (0%)

1 (3%)