Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of two recent trials of hypothermia in cardiac arrest

From: Hypothermia and neurologic outcome in patients following cardiac arrest: should we be hot to cool off our patients?

  

Trial

Study information and statistical significance

European [1]

Australian [2]

Type of study

Randomized: normothermia versus hypothermia

Randomized: normothermia versus hypothermia

  

Multicentered, with nine centers in five countries

Four accepting emergency departments

  

Blinded outcome

Not blinded for treatment or outcome

Number of patients

275 Total

77 Total

  

138 Normothermia

34 Normothermia

  

137 Hypothermia

43 Hypothermia

Criteria

Inclusion

Witnessed arrest

Initial rhythm VF

  

Arrest secondary to VF

Continued coma after ROSC

  

Age 18–75 years

Age: women >50 years; men >18 years

  

<60 min to ROSC

 
 

Exclusion

Temp <30°C

Cardiogenic shock (SBP <90 mmHg despite epinephrine)

  

Coagulopathy

 
  

Pregnant

Pregnant

  

Awake before randomization

Other causes of coma

  

MAP <60 mmHg for >30 min

ICU bed unavailable

  

Hypoxemia for >15 min

 
  

Terminal illness

 
  

Unavailable for follow-up

 
  

Enrolment in other study

 

Comparability of hypothermia and normothermia groups

The normothermia group had higher rates of coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus

The normothermia group had a higher percentage of bystander-performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Cooling

Temperature used

32–34°C (bladder temperature)

33°C

 

Mechanism

Cool air circulating device and ice packs

Ice packs

 

Time to start

Mean 105 min

Cooling began prehospital at a rate of 0.9°C/hour

 

Duration

24 hours

12 hours

Rewarming

 

Passive over 8 hours

Passive

Side effects

 

No statistical difference between the two groups

No statistical difference between the two groups

End-points

Primary

Favorable neurologic outcome at 6 months after arrest

Discharge to home or rehabilitation

 

Secondary

(1) Mortality within 6 months

Side effects of hemodynamic, biochemical, or hematological instability

  

(2) Complications within 7 days

 

Outcomes

 

Hypothermia: favorable outcome in 75 patients (55%)

Hypothermia: favorable outcome in 21 patients (49%)

  

Normothermia: favorable outcome in 54 patients (39%)

Normothermia: favorable outcome in 9 patients (26%)

Statistical significance of the outcomes

P = 0.009

P = 0.046

  1. The table summarizes some of the features of the two recent studies that examined the neuroprotective advantage of hypothermia in treatment of cardiac arrest. ICU, intensive care unit; ROSC, restoration of spontaneous circulation; VF, ventricular fibrillation.