From: Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTATTM) platform
Simulator survey question | Yes | No | Abstained |
---|---|---|---|
During the simulations, did the LSTAT allow you to properly manage the patient? | 31/31 (100%) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) |
If no other medical equipment was available and you were called upon to resuscitate a patient with the LSTAT in a remote setting, do you feel it would be sufficient? | 30/31 (97%) | 0/31 (0%) | 1/31 (3%) |
Do you feel that it is safe to proceed to the clinical phase of this study where patients will be placed on the LSTAT? | 31/31 (100%) | 0/31 (0%) | 0/31 (0%) |
During the simulations using the LSTAT were critical changes in vital signs detected in a timely manner? | 27/31 (87%) | 3/31 (10%) | 1/31 (3%) |
Were there any limitations in the LSTAT that prevented you from detecting critical changes in vital signs and adequately addressing them? | 10/31 (33%) | 20/31 (67%) | 0/31 (0%) |
Did the visual and auditory alarms provide immediate and directed attention to the alarm condition? | 20/31 (64%) | 8/31 (26%) | 3/31 (10%) |
Would suction be useful during transport? | 20/31 (64%) | 3/31 (10%) | 8/31 (26%) |
Would capnography be useful during transport? | 26/31 (83%) | 2/31 (7%) | 3/31 (10%) |
Were the LSTAT controls accessible and easy to operate? | 27/31 (87%) | 3/31 (10%) | 1/31 (3%) |
During the simulations, did the location of the ventilator connection and physiologic monitor cables allow adequate access to the patient, controls, and displays? | 27/31 (87%) | 0/31 (0%) | 4/31 (13%) |