Open Access

Automatic protective ventilation using the ARDSNet protocol with the additional monitoring of electrical impedance tomography

  • Anake Pomprapa1Email author,
  • David Schwaiberger2,
  • Philipp Pickerodt2,
  • Onno Tjarks2,
  • Burkhard Lachmann2 and
  • Steffen Leonhardt1
Critical Care201418:R128

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13937

Received: 14 January 2014

Accepted: 5 June 2014

Published: 23 June 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Automatic ventilation for patients with respiratory failure aims at reducing mortality and can minimize the workload of clinical staff, offer standardized continuous care, and ultimately save the overall cost of therapy. We therefore developed a prototype for closed-loop ventilation using acute respiratory distress syndrome network (ARDSNet) protocol, called autoARDSNet.

Methods

A protocol-driven ventilation using goal-oriented structural programming was implemented and used for 4 hours in seven pigs with lavage-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Oxygenation, plateau pressure and pH goals were controlled during the automatic ventilation therapy using autoARDSNet. Monitoring included standard respiratory, arterial blood gas analysis and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images. After 2-hour automatic ventilation, a disconnection of the animal from the ventilator was carried out for 10 seconds, simulating a frequent clinical scenario for routine clinical care or intra-hospital transport.

Results

This pilot study of seven pigs showed stable and robust response for oxygenation, plateau pressure and pH value using the automated system. A 10-second disconnection at the patient-ventilator interface caused impaired oxygenation and severe acidosis. However, the automated protocol-driven ventilation was able to solve these problems. Additionally, regional ventilation was monitored by EIT for the evaluation of ventilation in real-time at bedside with one prominent case of pneumothorax.

Conclusions

We implemented an automatic ventilation therapy using ARDSNet protocol with seven pigs. All positive outcomes were obtained by the closed-loop ventilation therapy, which can offer a continuous standard protocol-driven algorithm to ARDS subjects.

Introduction

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe form of acute multifactorial lung injury with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Despite extensive information on ARDS regarding its clinical features [14], pathologic findings [5] and prognosis [6, 7], the mortality has remained unchanged for many decades [8, 9]. A considerable challenge in critical care medicine is therefore to rescue ARDS patients by means of ventilatory therapy in the short term and to optimize morbidity in the long term [10].

The term ARDS was first introduced in 1967 [11]. However, a clear definition was not quantified and remained controversial for many decades [12]. In 1994, a standard definition was recommended by the American–European Consensus Conference committee [13]. The pathological state of ARDS was defined by the ratio of arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2 < 200) in the presence of bilateral infiltrates on the chest X-ray image and pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤ 18 mmHg. In 2012, the definition of ARDS was revised and called the Berlin definition [14, 15]. The criteria were similar to those of the American–European Consensus Conference, but with further classification of the severity; that is, mild (200 < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300), moderate (100 < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200) and severe (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100) at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥ 5 cmH2O [15].

ARDS is caused by the formation of protein-rich alveolar edema after damage to the integrity of the alveolar–capillary barrier [16]. Patients with ARDS generally experience shortness of breath with loss of lung compliance due to the formation of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and inactivation of surfactant, leading to alveolar collapse and atelectasis. Progressive hypoxia and an increased work of breathing are then unavoidable. At the onset, ventilation support with mechanical ventilation is generally required.

Since 2000, protective ventilation using the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (ARDSNet) protocol has continued to be the cornerstone in intensive care for ARDS therapy. With this ventilation strategy, a reduction of mortality (31% vs. 39.8%) was clearly demonstrated as compared with conventional ventilation using a higher tidal volume per kilogram of predicted body weight (PBW) of 12 ml/kg [17]. With this outstanding result, the original ARDSNet protocol was implemented in our automatic ventilation therapy system. The therapeutic approach focuses not only on avoiding ventilator-induced lung injury by using low tidal volume per PBW (≤6 ml/kg) and restricted plateau pressure (Pplat ≤30 cmH2O), but also on providing sufficient gas exchange with defined oxygenation targets and meeting pH goals. The goals for protective ventilation using this protocol are to improve and regulate oxygenation, to minimize Pplat and to control pH value. Five ventilatory settings are of particular interest: FiO2, PEEP, tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR) and inspiratory–expiratory time ratio (I:E ratio).

To achieve these goals, the ventilation variables have to be properly adjusted during ventilatory therapy, which generally requires continuous care from clinical staff, especially for patients with severe ARDS. To minimize the workload of daily clinical practice and to maintain the standard protocol of protective ventilation, we introduce automatic control of ventilation as a concept for the treatment. In this article, we describe a strategy of automatic ventilation in ARDS patients, including continuous monitoring of regional ventilation at thoracic cavity using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images [18]. All therapeutic decisions in this context rely on the original ARDSNet protocol.

Materials and methods

In this section, we describe the concept for automatic ventilation using the ARDSNet protocol and present some details on the implementation.

System setup

The system consists of a panel PC (PPC-154 T; Advantech Co., Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan), a mechanical ventilator (SERVO 300; Marquet Critical Care AB, Solna, Sweden), and other equipment including a capnography device with pulse oximetry (CO2SMO+; Philips Respironics, Best, The Netherlands), a spectrophotometry device (CeVOX; Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Feldkirchen, Germany) to measure arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), a patient monitor (Sirecust 960; Siemens AG, Munich, Germany), and an EIT device (GOE-MF II; Dräger AG, Lübeck, Germany). All measured signals are transmitted directly to the panel PC including parameters from the mechanical ventilator, by which airway pressure and airway flow are converted by a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter (KPCMCIA-12AI-C; Keithley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, OH, USA). The computed commands of ventilatory variables are transmitted from the panel PC to the mechanical ventilator by a 12-bit digital-to-analog converter (PCMDA12B; SuperLogics Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Automatic adjustment of ventilatory settings can be made by this setup.

Communication protocol

The protocols from the different commercial devices are graphically programmed using Labview software (version 7.1; National Instruments Inc., USA). The specific binary codes for each device are transmitted from the panel PC to the devices. The interfaces are based on RS-232 standard. To obtain the up-to-date measured parameters, the requested commands must be repeatedly sent to all devices in every sampling period of 100 milliseconds. Once the panel PC receives a response from a device, the data are decoded and saved on a regular basis within the sampling time.

Preparation for animal studies

After approval from the Department of Health and Social Services Berlin (reference number IC 113-G0151/10), all animal procedures were conducted complying with national regulations and institutional animal care committee guidelines. Seven female domestic pigs (29 ± 3 kg) received premedication and general anesthesia with thiopental, fentanyl and pancuronium, and were then tracheotomized in a supine position. A spectrophotometry catheter (CeVOX; Pulsion Medical Systems AG) was inserted into the carotid artery for measuring SaO2. Noninvasive measurements of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) from capnography device and from the patient monitor were placed at the left ear and at the tail, respectively. In addition, a central venous line and a pulmonary artery catheter were placed into the internal jugular vein for continuous monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure and central venous pressure and for drug and crystalloid fluid infusion. Subsequently, the pigs underwent surfactant depletion with repetitive lavages by warm (37 to 38°C) saline solution (0.9% NaCl, 40 ml/kg body weight) to induce ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg) at FiO2 of 1.0 [19]. The lavages were carried out between two and four times (average three times) within 5 minutes. The pigs were then ventilated in volume-controlled mode with VT of 6 ml/kg body weight and static PEEP of 5 cmH2O. After 30 minutes, the closed-loop ventilation was started. However, after 2 hours of ventilation, a disconnection from the ventilator was performed for 10 seconds, simulating involuntary patient–ventilator disconnection during patient handling.

ARDSNet protocol

To some extent, our algorithm of the ARDSNet protocol is based on earlier work of our group [20, 21]. The protocol is a ventilation strategy using low tidal volume at 6 ml/kg of the PBW based on the formulae given in Equations (1) and (2) for male and female subjects [17]:
PBW male = 50 + 2.3 height inches - 60
(1)
PBW female = 45.5 + 2.3 height inches - 60
(2)

In the present study, PBW was replaced with the actual measured body weight for the ventilation setting on VT. The following goals should be fulfilled.

Oxygenation goal: PaO2 for 55 to 80 mmHg or SpO2 for 88 to 95%

A linear combination between PEEP and FiO2, shown in Table 1 for lower PEEP/higher FiO2, was applied for control of oxygenation.
Table 1

PEEP and FiO 2 combination from the ARDSNet protocol (lower PEEP/higher FiO 2 )

PEEP (cmH2O)

5

5

8

8

10

10

10

12

14

14

14

16

18

18 to 24

FiO2

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.9

0.9

0.9

1.0

ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure.

Generally, PEEP is used to prevent lung collapse, while more FiO2 is given in order to meet the predefined oxygenation goal. The increment of both ventilation variables improves oxygenation for ARDS patients. Hence, in our implementation, the lower PEEP/higher FiO2 table of the protocol [17] was used for the automatic ventilation.

Plateau pressure goal: ≤ 30 cmH 2 O

Based on the recommendation, Pplat should be checked at least every 4 hours and also after the change of PEEP or VT. In our automatic ventilation scheme, Pplat was automatically checked every 10 minutes. The inspiratory pause was set to 0.5 seconds for five consecutive breaths, and the average of Pplat from these breaths was used to represent the measured Pplat. Further corrective action for VT adjustment is carried out by the following rules: if Pplat > 30 cmH2O, tidal volume per weight (VTPW) may be decreased by 1 ml/kg with the minimum value of 4 ml/kg; and if Pplat < 25 cmH2O and VTPW < 6 ml/kg, VTPW may be increased by 1 ml/kg until Pplat > 25 cmH2O or VTPW = 6 ml/kg.

Hence, VTPW was generally set to 6 ml/kg but was allowed to be reduced to 4 or 5 ml/kg if Pplat > 30 cmH2O. On the other hand, VTPW was allowed to be 7 or 8 ml/kg if breath stacking or dyssynchrony was observed during the ventilation therapy. For the implementation, Pplat was regularly evaluated about every 10 minutes.

pH goal: 7.30 to 7.45

Arterial pH values were measured by arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis (ABL 5; Radiometer Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark) every 30 minutes; this value was manually entered into the panel PC for further evaluation of the pH goal. The initial RR was set to approximate baseline minute ventilation, but should be limited by a maximum value of 35 breaths per minute (bpm). The initial setting of RR was computed as follows:
RR = M V baseline V TPW × Weight
(3)

Based on the averaged body weight of the pigs (29 ± 3 kg), baseline minute ventilation of 4 l/minute was chosen for the initial setting of RR. Further adjustment of RR was based on the measured pH value by the resulting acidosis or alkalosis.

Rules for acidosis management (pH < 7.30)

The following rules were followed for management of acidosis: if pH = 7.15 to 7.30, RR should be increased until pH > 7.30 or PaCO2 < 25 mmHg (maximum RR = 35 bpm); if pH < 7.15, RR should be increased to 35 bpm; and if pH remains < 7.15, VTPW should be increased by 1 ml/kg until pH > 7.15 (maximum VTPW = 8 ml/kg).

Rules for alkalosis management (pH > 7.45)

If pH > 7.45, RR should be decreased. A stepwise change of RR is set at ±5 bpm with the aim to control pH value.

Inspiratory–expiratory ratio goal

Generally, the I:E ratio for ARDS patients is set between 1:1 and 1:3. In the present study, the I:E ratio was fixed at 1:2.

Programming architecture

The protocol can be effectively developed by goal-oriented structural programming. The overall complexity of the protocol is simplified by a task-based programming structure, presented in Figure 1. This structure increases efficiency in coding the program.
Figure 1

Flowchart for automatic ventilation using the ARDSNet protocol. ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; I:E ratio, inspiratory–expiratory ratio; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RR, respiratory rate; VT, tidal volume.

Once the automatic ventilation is started, the initialization activates all initial settings of ventilation variables, such as PEEP, FiO2, VT, RR, and I:E ratio. Regarding the oxygenation goal, PEEP of 14 cmH2O and FiO2 of 0.7 from the middle of the Table 1 are initially selected. These settings should be given for a number of breaths and this is represented by a 30-second waiting block or the ventilation task in Figure 1. Thereafter, SaO2 is evaluated for further adjustment of the PEEP and FiO2 combination.

During the experiments, a number of choices for oxygenation goal can be made either by invasive measurement of SaO2 from the spectrophotometry device (CeVOX; Pulsion Medical Systems SE), or by noninvasive measurement of SpO2 from the capnography device (CO2SMO+; Philips Respironics), or from the patient monitor (Sirecust 960; Siemens AG). In our experiments, SaO2 measured from CeVOX was chosen for control of oxygenation. If SaO2 falls below 88%, a higher combination of PEEP and FiO2 should be given. In contrast, if SaO2 rises above 95%, a lower combination of PEEP and FiO2 should be applied to minimize hemodynamic effects of PEEP and to reduce the risk of oxygen toxicity.

After achieving the oxygenation goal, the next step is to check for the pH goal. If there is no new pH value, a further evaluation of Pplat should be made. However, if a new pH value is manually given, proper adjustment of RR and VT should be performed for the pH goal. After fulfilling the pH goal, the plateau pressure goal is carried out every 10 minutes or after a change in PEEP or a change in VT. All new variables are applied to the subject for a number of breaths. This repeated process is continuously performed. Using this goal-oriented structure, all goals of the ARDSNet protocol will be accomplished.

Results

Employing the porcine model of induced surfactant depletion as previously described, we now present the results of the automatic ventilation therapy using the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (autoARDSNet) protocol, based on invasive measurement of SaO2 in the carotid artery, with additional EIT images.

Oxygenation goal during the autoARDSNet protocol

Seven cases of porcine dynamics were studied with the protocol. As an example of the system performance, we present 4 hours of ventilation from one of the pigs (27 kg). During the lavage, the ventilation settings were set by manual operation and the automatic mode was subsequently turned on for ventilation therapy after PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg for 15 minutes. The oxygenation was kept within the range between 88 and 95%, hence satisfying the oxygenation criterion. Using Table 1, the knowledge-based controller was able to stabilize and regulate the SaO2 value.

Figure 2 shows the response of lung lavage in the first 30 minutes and the automatic ventilation for stabilization and regulation of SaO2 by adjusting PEEP and FiO2 referred to in Table 1. At 2.5 hours, or 2 hours after automatic ventilation, a disconnection of ventilation was made for 10 seconds, simulating a clinical scenario of airway suction or accidental disconnection. The controller was able to recover the critical situation of low oxygenation by step-by-step change for the values of PEEP and FiO2, until PEEP of 24 cmH2O and FiO2 of 1.0. Subsequently, an automatic titration of suitable PEEP and FiO2 was carried out again to fulfill the oxygenation goal.
Figure 2

Control of arterial oxygen saturation using Table1for a 27 kg pig. Right: magnified view for 15 minutes after the disconnection time (2.5 hours). ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; VTPW, tidal volume per weight.

Plateau pressure during the autoARDSNet protocol

To minimize ventilator-induced lung injury, the Pplat goal should be kept below 30 cmH2O by the adjustment of VT[13]. During the time 0.5 to 2.5 hours shown in Figure 3, Pplat was definitely less than 25 cmH2O while VTPW was maintained at 6 ml/kg.
Figure 3

Control of plateau pressure with the computed lung compliance for the 27 kg pig. ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Crs, lung compliance; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; Pplat, plateau pressure; VTPW, tidal volume per weight.

During the time between 2.5 and 3.25 hours (hypoxia as presented in Figure 2 due to disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface at 2.5 hours), Pplat was >30 cmH2O and VTPW was reset from 6 to 5 ml/kg and from 5 to 4 ml/kg, respectively, while the PEEP and FiO2 combination was increased to possible maximum values. At 3.25 hours, when Pplat < 25 cmH2O and VTPW < 6 ml/kg, VTPW was automatically increased stepwise by 1 ml/kg increments to 5 ml/kg. Using this approach, the goal of Pplat is satisfied with the main objective to minimize Pplat ≤ 30 cmH2O.

pH goal during the autoARDSNet protocol

Figure 4 shows the result of pH control for the 27 kg pig. The pH values were regularly measured every 30 minutes. At 0.5, 1 and 1.5 hours, the pH value was <7.30, and RR was increased by 5 bpm after entering the pH value into the system. At 2 and 2.5 hours, the pH goal was satisfied and RR remained unchanged. At 2.5 hours, ABG was measured before the 10-second disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface. At the next ABG (3 hours), the pH value falls below 7.15. RR was immediately set at 35 bpm to treat severe acidosis due to disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface. With the maximum limit of RR at 35 bpm, this resulted in an increase of the pH value to >7.15. At 3.5 and 4 hours, the pH value was 7.15 to 7.30 and RR should be increased. However, RR was already at its limit set at 35 bpm.
Figure 4

Control of the pH value for the 27 kg pig. Circles on the pH curve indicate manual arterial blood gas measurements. ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; RR, respiratory rate.

Monitoring of carbon dioxide

Figure 5 shows arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) from ABG and end-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2) during the 4 hours of ventilation. PaCO2 significantly increased after lung lavage, which indicates poor gas exchange or partial lung collapse (atelectasis). This is also confirmed by the SaO2 curve and the EIT images in the next subsection. After turning on the protocol for 2 hours during 0.5 to 2.5 hours, gas exchange was gradually improved due to the ventilation therapy. Again, at 2.5 hours, poor gas exchange recurred during hypoxia because of disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface for 10 seconds. Since PaCO2 was taken before disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface, severe hypercapnia was later detected (at 3 hours). However, the automatic ventilation improved gas exchange and severe hypercapnia was relieved in a timely manner.
Figure 5

Monitoring of arterial carbon dioxide tension and end-tidal carbon dioxide during automatic ventilation therapy using ARDSNet protocol for the 27 kg pig. ABG, arterial blood gas; ARDSNet, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; etCO2, end-tidal carbon dioxide; PaCO2, arterial carbon dioxide tension.

By monitoring carbon dioxide parameters, physiological dead space can be estimated by Bohr–Enghoff’s equation [22]:
V D V T = PaC O 2 - etC O 2 PaC O 2
(4)

where VD denotes physiological dead space. Based on the dataset of 4-hour ventilation, the average fraction of physiological dead space for this pig was 0.39. In the other words, approximately 60% of the tidal volume took part in the gas exchange.

Electrical impedance tomography

EIT allows non-invasive monitoring of electrical impedance within the thoracic cavity in a two-dimensional and cross-sectional plane in order to assess regional ventilation [23]. Pathophysiological changes of the lung can be observed from the EIT images in real time at the bedside. Sixteen electrodes were used for the voltage measurement and the backprojection algorithm [24] was implemented for image reconstruction. A 32 pixel × 32 pixel EIT image is captured at the end of inspiration, as shown in Figure 6. Based on the attachment of the EIT belt in the predefined arrangement of the electrodes shown in Figure 6 (left image), ventral and dorsal parts of the animal are situated at the top (electrode position 1) and at the bottom (electrode position 9) of the EIT image, respectively. The position of the left and right lungs can therefore be determine in the specified position as shown and similar to the standard interpretation, obtained from a computed tomography scan image.All seven female pigs (weighing 29 ± 3 kg) were ventilated using the autoARDSNet protocol; the results of their EIT images are summarized in Figure 7. These results show the EIT images before and after lavage, and after 2 hours and 4 hours of ventilation using the protocol. The area of high electrical impedance corresponds to the movement of air, which is designated by tones of orange and yellow. After lavage, a loss of lung volume and poor dorsal ventilation can be observed by the images in all cases. After 2 hours and 4 hours of ventilation, a progressive improvement of dorsal ventilation can be seen compared with the EIT images after lavage.
Figure 6

Orientation of electrical impedance tomography belt with 16 electrodes and the reconstructed 32 pixel × 32 pixel EIT image after induction of ARDS in the rainbow-color coding scheme. ARDS, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; EIT, electrical impedance tomography; L, left; R, right.

Figure 7

Electrical impedance tomography images at the end of inspiration from seven pigs during automatic ventilation therapy using the ARDSNet protocol. EIT, electrical impedance tomography.

Regarding pig #7, pneumothorax was observed by EIT image after 2 hours of ventilation demonstrating that only the left lung was ventilated. A corrective action was made at 2.75 hours to release excess pressure at the right lung, which improved lung compliance, oxygenation, hemodynamics and carbon dioxide exchange. Based on this experience, we believe that the EIT device is useful for practical decision-making at the bedside.

Regional analysis of ventilation [25] was carried out for six pigs (excluding pig #7 due to the pneumothorax), as shown in Figure 8. Horizontal bars represent the median of regional ventilation in percent at each specific pixel, while the whiskers are the outliers of extreme regional ventilation. Before lavage, median regional ventilation at the 15th pixel contributed the most to ventilation (55%). After lavage, the 13th pixel occupied the leading median regional ventilation of 48%, reflecting atelectasis in dorsal lung sections. After 2 hours and 4 hours of automated ventilation, the 14th pixel contributed the most to median regional ventilation of 45% and 50%, respectively, signifying the recruitment of previously atelectatic surface.
Figure 8

Regional analysis of ventilation for six pigs (excluding pig #7).

Significant parameters during the autoARDSNet protocol

Box-and-whisker plots indicating the median (25th to 75th percentiles) are shown in Figure 9. These plots quantitatively describe various significant parameters for all seven pigs. The parameters are presented before lavage, after lavage and every 0.5 hours. During the process of lavage inducing ARDS, PaO2/FiO2 was evaluated by ABG. The median of PaO2/FiO2 was 70 mmHg and all cases were below 100 mmHg, representing severe ARDS. By regulating SaO2 at 88 to 95% in Figure 9a, PaO2/FiO2 values were improved for all cases by the protocol as shown in Figure 9b. At 2.5 hours, disconnection at the patient–ventilator interface was carried out and the median of PaO2/FiO2 was 94 mmHg. The 4 hours of ventilation using the protocol increased PaO2/FiO2 and the ARDS condition generally improved from severe ARDS to moderate ARDS based on the Berlin definition [15].
Figure 9

Box-and-whisker plots for significant parameters during automatic ventilation therapy using the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network protocol. (a) Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). (b) Arterial oxygen tension/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2). (c) Plateau pressure (Pplat). (d) pH. (e) Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2). (f) End-tidal carbon dioxide (etCO2).

In Figure 9c, the Pplat goal ≤30 cmH2O was satisfied in most cases. However, the pH value in Figure 9d was slightly lower than the pH goal between 7.30 and 7.45 in the first 1.5 hours of ventilation period for the protocol. Initial minute ventilation or baseline minute ventilation may increase from 4 to 5 l/minute to improve the pH value at the beginning of automatic ventilation.

Based on PaCO2 measured from ABG every 0.5 hours, Figure 9e represents permissive hypercapnia with an approximate value of 60 mmHg. Whilst Figure 9f shows etCO2 of an average 43 mmHg during ventilation therapy, etCO2 differed significantly from PaCO2, indicating a diffusion problem.

Discussion

To achieve the oxygenation goal, two parameters (PaO2 in the range 55 to 80 mmHg and SaO2 between 88 and 95%) can be selected for the control objective. PaO2 was not chosen for this control objective because no commercial device for continuous measurement currently exists. In our setup, a change in PEEP and FiO2 translates to changes of SaO2 at the carotid artery in about 7 seconds, whereas it takes about 40 seconds for a change of SpO2 at the pig tail. SaO2 would also be valid even if circulation centralizes. However, technically both the SaO2 and the SpO2 signals can be used in our system. Because of the more stable and faster SaO2 response time, we chose this signal for establishing our automatized ARDSNet protocol. From a clinical perspective, SaO2 measurements will need to be replaced by high-quality SpO2 measurements.

PEEP also plays a vital role to prevent atelectasis. Several tables for lower and higher PEEP have been proposed as a guideline for ventilating a patient [17, 18]. However, the proposed PEEP value might not be optimal: if PEEP is too high, it will cause regional hyperinflation: if PEEP is too low, it will cause dorsal end-expiratory collapse and excessive cyclic shear forces between atelectatic and nonatelectatic areas [26]. To optimize PEEP, many titration techniques have been developed; for instance, using the stress index [27, 28], the assessment of transpulmonary pressure [29], or the optimization of ventilation homogeneity by EIT [30]. Owing to possible oxygen toxicity by excess FiO2[31], a feedback control system for regulating oxygenation to prespecified targets using FiO2[32] may thus use any combination of the protocols described above for PEEP titration. Hyperoxia shall then be avoided. Hence, many options to reach the oxygenation goal are available for a new formulation of PEEP–FiO2 combination.

Pplat was measured during an end-inspiratory pause for 0.5 seconds and represents alveolar pressure. Pplat > 30 cmH2O is associated with a higher mortality rate [17]. To fulfill the second goal of protective ventilation, VTPW should be reduced in stepwise increments of 1 cmH2O, with a lowest limit of 4 ml/kg. For severe ARDS patients, PEEP should be set relatively high enough to satisfy oxygenation goal. Hence, VTPW should automatically be minimized to either 5 or 4 ml/kg, so that Pplat is forced to be less than 30 cmH2O. During ventilation therapy using the autoARDSNet protocol, Pplat may not be able to meet the goal at all times. With automatic ventilation, Pplat was regularly evaluated and discrete (sampling) control of the Pplat value is implemented.

The pH goal can be achieved by adjusting of RR and VT based on ABG taken every 30 minutes. With this time frame, perfect control of the pH value may not always be satisfied. Better control of the pH value can (theoretically) be improved by introducing continuous measurement of the pH value; however, no device is currently available to achieve this. Additionally, during the animal studies, an I:E ratio of 1:2 was fixed for the entire period of ventilation. A change of I:E ratio can influence carbon dioxide elimination [33]. For an adult, a range of 1:1 to 1:3 is considered acceptable for mechanical ventilation. Further studies are needed to examine changes in the I:E ratio and their correlation with the pH goal during automatic ventilation therapy. Carbon dioxide control based on adjustment of the I:E ratio would add another dimension of algorithmic flexibility; however, it would also increase the complexity of the rule base.

The three main goals, namely oxygenation, pH and plateau pressure, are targeted during the therapy. The oxygenation goal is considered highest priority, and in our algorithm the evaluation of this goal is carried out every 30 seconds. Owing to a rather slow response of the underlying physiological dynamics, the delay time of 30 seconds was chosen for acquiring the SaO2 response for a particular setting of ventilatory variables. Plateau pressure and pH goals were considered of secondary and tertiary priority and thus their evaluation periods were chosen to be 10 minutes and 30 minutes, respectively. Remember that in the original ARDSNet protocol the advice was to measure Pplat at least every 4 hours [17]. For the pH goal, measurements were based on 30-minute ABG analysis.

The monitoring of carbon dioxide (PaCO2 and etCO2) provides useful physiological information for gas exchange and physiological dead space. During 4 hours of ventilation, dead space was relatively constant, and in such cases etCO2 could be used to estimate PaCO2, even in the case of inhomogeneous lung condition in such cases as ARDS. The adjustment of RR therefore leads to a regulation of etCO2 and PaCO2[34]. Based on a mass balance, Equation (4) assumes that all the expired carbon dioxide comes from the alveolar gas. For the impaired alveolar gas exchange, there are a number of possible causes; for example, perfusion deficiency, diffusion barriers due to pulmonary edema, and reduced alveolar ventilation due to bronchial obstruction [35]. All of these problematic sources influence the computation of dead space. Using this animal model, dead space calculation reflects true dead space before the lavage, but after the lavage this computation may reveal only impaired diffusion in the presence of an induced pulmonary edema.

With successive lung lavages, pulmonary surfactant was removed from the pig’s lungs, causing atelectasis and ARDS. Theoretically, during the course of 4 hours of ventilation, endogenous surfactant reproduction from the remaining pneumocyte type II cells could weaken the ARDS condition. Hence, the respiratory system compliance would gradually be restored. However, as demonstrated in Figure 3, the dynamic lung compliance was stable at 0.92 ml/kg/cmH2O for 2 hours after the therapy and even decreased to 0.6 and 0.76 ml/kg/cmH2O after a 10-second disconnection for the last 1.5 hours. From this, endogenous surfactant production seemed not to play a significant role in our ARDS model. However, further research on endogenous surfactant production in such animal models could be useful as background information for the ventilation management.

During the experiments, the supine position was set up and poor dorsal ventilation was expected. EIT images can be used to analyze the lung conditions; for example, improved dorsal ventilation, atelectasis or a detection of pneumothorax. This noninvasive measurement gives more insight into the lung pathophysiology during ventilation therapy at the bedside.

Considering the Berlin ARDS definition [15] and Figure 9b, after the lung lavage all of our animals were classified as severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100 mmHg). To meet the oxygenation goal, PaO2/FiO2 was improving from severe to moderate ARDS during the 4 hours of automatic ventilation therapy in most cases (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg), indicating an effective performance of the automatic ventilation. Simultaneously, the plateau pressure (Pplat ≤ 30 cmH2O) and the pH goals were fulfilled, as shown in Figure 9c and Figure 9d, respectively.

Clinically, other adjunct therapies are available when conventional lung-protective ventilation is not sufficient: proning, nitric oxide, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The most severe cases should be transferred to ARDS centers when conventional ventilation measures fail. Yet most ARDS patients have not received lung-protective ventilation [36]. The autoARDSNet protocol may thus help to foster protocol adherence.

One characteristic of this lavage-induced ARDS model, originally proposed by our group [19], is the high recruitability of the injured lung in conjunction with the concomitant changes in physiological variables (airway pressure, compliance, PaO2 or PaCO2). This model thus allowed us to maximize the changes brought about by our ventilatory protocol. Whereas the other lung injury models, such as oleic acid infusion or hydrochloric acid aspiration, may be more comparable with the human disease [37], our model is nearly ideal to study the effects of mechanical ventilation on lung injury. Hence, it would be worthwhile to also examine the performance of the closed-loop control concept in these animal models in future projects.

In clinical practice, the proposed automatic ventilation therapy system could continuously provide a standard protocol-driven ventilation for patients with ARDS. The system’s benefits include a guaranteed consistency of care, especially during night shifts or other periods of staff shortages (like epidemias). In any case, both autoARDSNet ventilation and manual intervention by clinical staff must ensure that there is no failure of measuring equipment, which is crucial in decision-making during the therapy. Reliable measurements of vital parameters are a prerequisite. At present, our system does not represent clinically applicable devices and sensors because it does not yet have any fault-tolerance measures – this must be dealt with by future manufacturers prior to any market approval by legal authorities. One should, however, emphasize that a recent study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of closed-loop ventilation in 100 patients with ARDS for 392 days [38].

Conclusion

The primary goal of this study was to develop autoARDSNet, a prototype of fully automated ventilation therapy using the ARDSNet protocol. This protocol is known to minimize the mortality rate by 8.8% and is used in daily clinical practice worldwide. A patient with ARDS requires much attention during ventilation therapy, especially in a critical state of hypoxia. To reduce the workloads of clinical staff and to maintain the standard of ventilation therapy, automatic ventilation is a promising assistance mechanism for patients and clinical staff. Based on animal experiments, the protocol was found to be feasible and safe and can be used for patients with ARDS in the ICU.

Generally, immediate corrective action is required if the patient–ventilator interface is disconnected. In such cases, the automatic ventilation system can offer standard continuous care for the patients, thus increasing patient safety. In addition, EIT images can noninvasively be used for assessing the distribution of ventilation and monitoring other complications, such as pneumothorax, at the bedside in real time. Although the ARDSNet protocol is evidence based, it is not yet in general practice worldwide. Hence, the proposed automatic ventilation therapy system using the ARDSNet protocol may be beneficial for those centers that do not have the staff to implement the protocol, especially during night shifts, or are located in remote areas.

Key messages

  •  Automatic closed-loop ventilation using the ARDSNet protocol is feasible and safe in operation.

  •  A patient–ventilator disconnection should be omitted by any means; but autoARDSNet ventilation was able to implement an immediate corrective and lung-protective ventilatory strategy in lavage-induced ARDS pigs.

  •  EIT images can be noninvasively used for assessing regional ventilation and monitoring pneumothorax at the bedside in real time.

Abbreviations

ABG: 

arterial blood gas

ARDS: 

acute respiratory distress syndrome

ARDSNet: 

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network

autoARDSNet: 

automatic ventilation therapy using the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network

bpm: 

breaths per minute

EIT: 

electrical impedance tomography

etCO2

end-tidal carbon dioxide

FiO2

fraction of inspired oxygen

I: 

E ratio: inspiratory–expiratory ratio

PaCO2

arterial carbon dioxide tension

PaO2

arterial oxygen tension

PBW: 

predicted body weight

PEEP: 

positive end-expiratory pressure

Pplat

plateau pressure

RR: 

respiratory rate

SaO2

arterial oxygen saturation

SpO2

peripheral oxygen saturation

VT

tidal volume

VTPW

tidal volume per weight.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge device support from Pulsion Medical Systems AG, and clinical assistance from Mr Henrik Steinkraus during the animal experiments at Charité University Hospital Berlin.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Philips Chair of Medical Information Technology, Helmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University
(2)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum

References

  1. Dantzker DR, Brook CJ, Dehart P, Lynch JP, Weg JG: Ventilation–perfusion distributions in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979, 120: 1039-1052.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gattinoni L, Presenti A, Torresin A, Baglioni S, Rivolta M, Rossi F, Scarani F, Marcolin R, Cappelletti G: Adult respiratory distress syndrome profiles by computed tomography. J Thorac Imag 1986, 1: 25-30. 10.1097/00005382-198607000-00005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hudson LD, Milberg JA, Anardi D, Maunder RJ: Clinical risks for development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995, 151: 293-301. 10.1164/ajrccm.151.2.7842182PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kao SJ, Yeh DY, Chen HI: Clinical and pathological features of fat embolism with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Sci (Lond) 2007, 113: 279-285. 10.1042/CS20070011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, Frutos-Vivar F, Aramburu JA, Nájera L, Ferguson ND, Alía I, Gordo F, Ríos F: Comparison of clinical criteria for the acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy findings. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141: 440-445. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson TA, Caldwell ES, Curtis JR: Reduced quality of life in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with critically ill control patients. JAMA 1999, 281: 354-360. 10.1001/jama.281.4.354PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM: One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003, 348: 683-693. 10.1056/NEJMoa022450PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zambon M, Vincent JL: Mortality rates for patients with acute lung injury/ARDS have decreased over time. Chest 2008, 133: 1120-1127. 10.1378/chest.07-2134PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Phua J, Badia JR, Adhikari NKJ, Friedrich JO, Fowler RA, Singh JM, Scales DC, Stather DR, Li A, Gattas DJ, Hallett D, Tomlinson G, Stewart TE, Ferguson ND: Has mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome decreased over time? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 179: 220-227. 10.1164/rccm.200805-722OCPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Silversides JA, Ferguson ND: Clinical review: Acute respiratory distress syndrome – clinical ventilator management and adjunct therapy. Crit Care 2013, 17: 225. 10.1186/cc11867PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty T, Levine BE: Acute respiratory distress in adults. The Lancet 1967, 2: 319-323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR: An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988, 138: 720-723. 10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.720PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R: The American–European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 818-824. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012, 307: 2526-2533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, Brochard L, Brower R, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, Rhodes A, Slutsky AS, Vincent J-L, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ranieri VM: The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38: 1574-1582.Google Scholar
  16. Piantadosi CA, Schwartz DA: The acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141: 460-470. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volume as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2000, 342: 1301-1308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonhardt S, Lachmann B: Electrical impedance tomography – the holy grail for ventilation and perfusion monitoring? Intensive Care Med 2012, 38: 1917-1929. 10.1007/s00134-012-2684-zPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lachmann B, Robertson B, Vogel J: In vivo lung lavage as an experimental model of the respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1980, 24: 231-236. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1980.tb01541.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Meier T, Luepschen H, Grossherr M, Karsten J, Leonhardt S: Automated mechanical ventilation based on the ARDS Network protocol in porcine acute lung injury. Crit Care 2007, 11: 185. 10.1186/cc5345View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pomprapa A, Schwaiberger D, Lachmann B, Leonhardt S: Comparison of a fully automatic ARDSNet protocol and a feedback-controlled open lung management concept. Crit Care 2013, 17: 97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Suwa K, Bendixen HH: A mathematical analysis of physiological dead space in a lung model. J Appl Physiol 1968, 24: 549-555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bodenstein M, David M, Markstaller K: Principles of electrical impedance tomography and its clinical application. Crit Care Med 2009, 37: 713-724. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958d2fPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Barber DC, Seagar AD: Fast reconstruction of resistance images. Clin Phys Phisiol Meas 1987, 8: A:47-A:54. 10.1088/0143-0815/8/4A/006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinz J, Neumann P, Dudykevych T, Andersson LG, Wrigge H, Burchardi H, Hedenstierna G: Regional ventilation by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with ventilation scintigraphy in pigs. Chest 2003, 124: 314-322. 10.1378/chest.124.1.314PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lachmann B: Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med 1992, 18: 319-321. 10.1007/BF01694358PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Grasso S, Stripoli T, De Michele M, Bruno F, Moschetta M, Angelelli G, Munno I, Ruggiero V, Anaclerio R, Cafarelli A, Driessen B, Fiore T: ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007, 176: 761-767. 10.1164/rccm.200702-193OCPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Terragni PP, Rosboch GL, Lisi A, Viale AG, Ranieri VM: How respiratory system mechanics may help in minimising ventilator-induced lung injury in ARDS patients. Eur Respir J 2003, 42: 15s-21s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, O'Donnell CR, Ritz R, Lisbon A, Novack V, Loring SH: Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2008, 359: 2095-2104. 10.1056/NEJMoa0708638PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Möller K: PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care 2010, 14: R8. 10.1186/cc8860PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Clark JM: The toxicity of oxygen. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974, 110: 40-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pomprapa A, Alfocea S, Goebel C, Misgeld B, Leonhardt S: Funnel control for oxygenation during artificial ventilation therapy. In Proceedings of the 19th IFAC World Congress. Cape Town; 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Pomprapa A, Schwaiberger D, Lachmann B, Leonhardt S: A mathematical model for carbon dioxide elimination: an insight for tuning mechanical ventilation. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014, 114: 165-175. 10.1007/s00421-013-2754-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Pomprapa A, Misgeld B, Lachmann B, Walter M, Leonhardt S: Closed-loop ventilation of oxygenation and end-tidal CO 2 . In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). Manchester; 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Silbernagl S, Despopoulos A: Color Atlas of Physiology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2009:120-121.Google Scholar
  36. Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Dinglas VD, Sevransky JE, Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Desai SV, Shanholtz C, Brower RG, Pronovost PJ: Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012, 344: e2124. 10.1136/bmj.e2124PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Matute-Bello G, Downey G, Moore BB, Groshong SD, Matthay MA, Slutsky AS, Kuebler WM, Acute Lung Injury in Animals Study Group: An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute lung injury in animals. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011, 44: 725-738. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0210STPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Arnal JM, Garnero A, Novonti D, Demory D, Ducros L, Berric A, Donati SY, Corno G, Jaber S, Durand-Gasselin J: Feasibility study on full closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV™) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational comparative study. Crit Care 2013, 17: R196. 10.1186/cc12890PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pomprapa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.