Skip to main content

Table 4 Evaluation of tailored intervention

From: Implementing a multifaceted tailored intervention to improve nutrition adequacy in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study

 

Overall

Site 1

Site 2

Site 3

Site 4

Site 5

Compliance with the tailored action plan

Primary analysis of compliance with action plana

57%

6/8 (75%)

4/8 (50%)

1/7 (14%)

5/7 (71%)

6/8 (75%)

Secondary analysis of compliance with action planb

68%

6/7 (86%)

4/6 (67%)

1/6 (17%)

5/6 (83%)

6/7 (87%)

Progress rank for items in the action planc

4 (0 to 5)

4 (2 to 5)

3.5 (0 to 5)

3 (0 to 5)

4 (0 to 5)

4 (0 to 4)

Nurses responses to evaluation questionnaire

Know all members of Guideline Implementation Team

66/82 (80%)

12/13 (92%)

16/23 (70%)

15/23 (65%)

17/17 (100%)

6/6 (100%)

Discussed nutrition with Guideline Implementation Team daily or weekly

50/81 (62%)

10/13 (77%)

6/22 (27%)

17/23 (74%)

13/17 (77%)

4/6 (67%)

Prescribed calories received/caloric debt reported on rounds often or all the time

42/81 (52%)

9/13 (69%)

6/23 (26%)

12/23 (52%)

12/16 (75%)

3/6 (50%)

Agree or strongly agree that nutrition practice changed as a result of PERFECTIS

25/79 (32%)

7/13 (54%)

2/21 (9.5%)

9/23 (39%)

4/16 (25%)

1/6 (17%)

Number of PERFECTIS activities/resources as part of the action pland

8

9

9

7

7

9

PERFECTIS-related activities/resources exposed to

7 (0 to 9)

7 (5 to 9)

3 (0 to 9)

7 (1 to 7)

7 (2 to 7)

6.5 (2 to 8)

Rating of usefulness of PERFECTIS activities/resources exposed toe

4 (1 to 5)

4 (1 to 5)

4 (1 to 5)

4 (1 to 5)

4 (1 to 5)

4.5 (2 to 5)

  1. Data presented as percentage, median (range) or number (percentage). PERFECTIS, PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian nutrition guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy. aThe proportion of actions with a progress rank of 4 or 5 out of the total number of action items in the action plan. bThe proportion of actions with a progress rank of 4 or 5 out of the total number of action items in the action plan excluding items addressing nonmodifiable barriers with a progress rank of 0. cProgress rank: 0 = no action, 1 = initial steps taken but no steps complete, 2 = implementation in progress and some steps complete, 3 = implementation 50% complete, 4 = implementation 100% complete, and 5 = target/objectives exceeded. dNumber of activities/resources may not correspond to the number of action plan items because some action items may have involved more than one strategy/resource (for example, development of protocol, education session, and newsletter article) and some strategies (for example, educational session) may have been employed for several action items. eRating scale: 1 = useless, 2 = somewhat useless, 3 = neutral, 4 = somewhat useful, 5 = very useful.