Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics and outcomes of three recent meta-analyses

From: Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis

Author, year [ref]

Serpa Neto et al. 2012[38]

Hemmes et al. 2013[40]

Our meta-analysis

Number of studies

20 articles

8 articles

17 articles

Number of RCTs

15 articles

6 articles

17 articles

Populations

ICU and surgical patients

Only surgical patients

ICU and surgical patients

Search strategy until (year)

2012

2012

2013

Statistical analysis

Fixed effect + Mantel and Haenszel

Fixed effect + Mantel and Haenszel

Fixed effect + Mantel and Haenszel, when P > 25 % random effect plus DerSimonian and Laird

Number of patients

2833

 

1669

 

1362

 
 

PV group

CV group

PV group

CV group

PV group

CV group

VT (ml/kg)

6.5

10.6

6.1

10.4

6.1

10.7

PEEP (cm H2O)

6.4

3.4

6.6

2.7

7.6

2.5

Plateau pressure (cmH2O)

16.6

21.4

16.6

20.5

17.2

19.9

Main outcome

   

ALI

RR 0.33; 95 %CI 0.23-0.47

RR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.22-0.70

RR 0.27; 95 % CI 0.12-0.59

Pulmonary infection

RR 0.52; 95 %CI 0.33-0.82

RR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.43-0.97

RR 0.35; 95 % CI 0.25-0.63

Atelectasis

RR 0.62; 95 %CI 0.41-0.95

RR 0.67; 95 % CI 0.47-0.96

RR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.33-1.37

Mortality

RR 0.64; 95 %CI 0.46-0.86

No data

RR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.67-1.58

ICU length of stay

No data

No data

WMD -0.40; 95 %CI -1.02; 0.22

Hospital length of stay

No data

No data

WMD 0.13; 95 %CI -0.73; 0.08

Homogeneity test

Found heterogeneity in pulmonary infection outcome

Found heterogeneity in atelectasis outcome

Found heterogeneity in atelectasis, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay outcome

  1. RCT: randomized control trial; VT: tidal volume; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; PV: protective ventilation; CV: conventional ventilation; ICU: intensive care unit; RR: risk ratio; 95 % CI: 95 % confidence interval. WMD: weighted mean difference.